PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USBNX vs. VSMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USBNX achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than VSMVX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, USBNX has underperformed VSMVX with an annualized return of 7.77%, while VSMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.25% annualized return.


USBNX

1D
-0.66%
1M
0.78%
YTD
11.24%
6M
11.01%
1Y
21.56%
3Y*
13.88%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
7.77%

VSMVX

1D
-1.15%
1M
1.16%
YTD
15.25%
6M
15.26%
1Y
37.71%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
10.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
USBNX
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund
11.24%8.02%8.64%12.83%-5.09%15.35%-4.77%23.53%-11.05%6.42%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
15.25%6.38%7.53%14.85%-11.12%30.85%2.79%24.47%-12.67%11.64%

Correlation

The correlation between USBNX and VSMVX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2012

0.94

The correlation between USBNX and VSMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USBNX vs. VSMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USBNX
USBNX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
USBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
USBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
USBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
USBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMVX
VSMVX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VSMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USBNXVSMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

4.02

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.03

13.23

-6.19

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USBNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the VSMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USBNX and VSMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USBNXVSMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

2.05

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.26

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.43

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.50

-0.11

Drawdowns

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USBNX drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, which is greater than VSMVX's maximum drawdown of -47.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBNX and VSMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USBNXVSMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.40%

-47.61%

-16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-9.33%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.56%

-28.81%

+7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.01%

-28.81%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.96%

-47.61%

+0.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.15%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-7.64%

-5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.83%

+0.15%

Volatility

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) is 3.72%, while Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSMVX) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that USBNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USBNXVSMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

4.44%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

11.58%

-2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.85%

18.34%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

22.02%

-3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.66%

24.13%

-2.47%

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

USBNX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMVX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

USBNX vs. VSMVX - Dividend Comparison

USBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.41%, more than VSMVX's 1.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USBNX
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund
12.41%13.81%3.27%0.86%10.05%0.75%0.68%7.91%8.39%6.21%1.17%7.39%
VSMVX
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.65%1.45%1.85%1.92%1.88%1.66%1.46%1.65%1.89%1.55%1.26%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, USBNX and VSMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSMVX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to USBNX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USBNX dropped -64.40% vs VSMVX's -47.61%.

VSMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USBNX and VSMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer