USBNX vs. QFVOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX).
USBNX is managed by Pear Tree Funds. It was launched on Aug 3, 1992. QFVOX is managed by Pear Tree Funds. It was launched on May 14, 1998.
Performance
USBNX vs. QFVOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
USBNX vs. QFVOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund | 2.99% | 8.02% | 8.64% | 12.83% | -5.09% | 15.35% | -4.77% | 23.53% | -11.05% | 6.42% |
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund | 4.18% | 33.85% | -0.70% | 19.88% | -17.14% | 19.44% | 2.65% | 17.93% | -13.28% | 25.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USBNX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than QFVOX's 4.18% return. Over the past 10 years, USBNX has underperformed QFVOX with an annualized return of 7.35%, while QFVOX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.72% annualized return.
USBNX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 13.83%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.40%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
QFVOX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- 1Y
- 31.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
USBNX vs. QFVOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
USBNX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QFVOX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
USBNX vs. QFVOX — Risk / Return Rank
USBNX
QFVOX
USBNX vs. QFVOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) and Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USBNX | QFVOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 2.16 | -1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 2.66 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.42 | -1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 8.86 | -5.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USBNX | QFVOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 2.16 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.56 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.52 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.37 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between USBNX and QFVOX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
USBNX vs. QFVOX - Dividend Comparison
USBNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.41%, more than QFVOX's 5.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USBNX Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund | 13.41% | 13.81% | 3.27% | 0.86% | 10.05% | 0.75% | 0.68% | 7.91% | 8.39% | 6.21% | 1.17% | 7.39% |
QFVOX Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund | 5.43% | 5.66% | 1.95% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 10.11% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 0.98% | 0.60% | 1.02% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
USBNX vs. QFVOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USBNX drawdown since its inception was -64.40%, smaller than the maximum QFVOX drawdown of -70.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USBNX and QFVOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| USBNX | QFVOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.40% | -70.51% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.27% | -11.02% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.01% | -32.90% | +6.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.96% | -45.52% | -1.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.36% | -10.63% | +4.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -15.38% | +1.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 3.28% | +0.38% |
Volatility
USBNX vs. QFVOX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund (USBNX) is 4.15%, while Pear Tree Polaris Foreign Value Fund (QFVOX) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that USBNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFVOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| USBNX | QFVOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 7.41% | -3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.35% | 10.59% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 15.30% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 15.20% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 16.71% | +4.97% |