USAI vs. HAP
USAI (Pacer American Energy Independence ETF) and HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - USAI tracks the American Energy Independence Index while HAP tracks the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USAI returned 18.67%/yr vs 11.51%/yr for HAP. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for HAP.
Performance
USAI vs. HAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USAI achieves a 23.98% return, which is significantly higher than HAP's 21.52% return.
USAI
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 23.98%
- 6M
- 21.70%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- —
HAP
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 6M
- 23.43%
- 1Y
- 47.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
USAI vs. HAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 23.98% | 0.69% | 43.99% | 14.21% | 19.82% | 37.10% | -15.10% | 21.63% | -17.31% | 3.69% |
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 21.52% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 3.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between USAI and HAP is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USAI and HAP has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USAI vs. HAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USAI
HAP
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
USAI
HAP
Utilities
USAI
HAP
Basic Materials
USAI
-
HAP
Communication Services
USAI
-
HAP
-
Consumer Cyclical
USAI
-
HAP
Consumer Defensive
USAI
-
HAP
Financial Services
USAI
-
HAP
-
Healthcare
USAI
-
HAP
Industrials
USAI
-
HAP
Real Estate
USAI
-
HAP
Technology
USAI
-
HAP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USAI vs. HAP — Risk / Return Rank
USAI
HAP
USAI vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USAI | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.57 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 5.69 | -3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 23.18 | -17.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USAI | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 3.17 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.63 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.26 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
USAI vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USAI drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, which is greater than HAP's maximum drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAI and HAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USAI | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.25% | -50.73% | -14.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -8.31% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.22% | -16.92% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.68% | -25.66% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -1.93% | -2.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -12.03% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 2.03% | +1.96% |
Volatility
USAI vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) at 4.27%. This indicates that USAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USAI | HAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 4.27% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 12.23% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 14.91% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 18.24% | +2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 19.73% | +7.58% |
USAI vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
USAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than HAP's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
USAI vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison
USAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than HAP's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.87% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 4.13% | 5.03% | 3.62% | 4.99% | 5.41% | 6.15% | 7.67% | 6.50% | 5.56% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USAI and HAP have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USAI has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to HAP (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAI dropped -65.25% vs HAP's -50.73%.
On 5-year performance, USAI leads with 18.67% vs 11.51% for HAP. On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USAI has performed better with a 18.67% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for USAI.
USAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 1.87% for HAP.
USAI tracks American Energy Independence Index, while HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for USAI and 0.42% for HAP.
HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USAI and HAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer