USAI vs. COWZ
USAI (Pacer American Energy Independence ETF) and COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - USAI is a Energy Equities fund tracking the American Energy Independence Index, while COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, USAI returned 18.67%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for COWZ. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. USAI charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for COWZ.
Performance
USAI vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, USAI achieves a 23.98% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 8.30% return.
USAI
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 23.98%
- 6M
- 21.70%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.67%
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 8.30%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 22.75%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- —
USAI vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 23.98% | 0.69% | 43.99% | 14.21% | 19.82% | 37.10% | -15.10% | 21.63% | -17.31% | 3.69% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 2.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between USAI and COWZ is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between USAI and COWZ has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
USAI vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
USAI
COWZ
Energy
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
USAI
COWZ
Utilities
USAI
COWZ
-
Basic Materials
USAI
-
COWZ
Communication Services
USAI
-
COWZ
Consumer Cyclical
USAI
-
COWZ
Consumer Defensive
USAI
-
COWZ
Financial Services
USAI
-
COWZ
-
Healthcare
USAI
-
COWZ
Industrials
USAI
-
COWZ
Real Estate
USAI
-
COWZ
-
Technology
USAI
-
COWZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
USAI vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
USAI
COWZ
USAI vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| USAI | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 4.57 | -2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.62 | 12.47 | -6.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| USAI | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 2.06 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.60 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.65 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
USAI vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum USAI drawdown since its inception was -65.25%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USAI and COWZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| USAI | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.25% | -38.63% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -5.00% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.22% | -22.00% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.68% | -22.00% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -0.80% | -3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -4.80% | -4.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 1.83% | +2.16% |
Volatility
USAI vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer American Energy Independence ETF (USAI) has a higher volatility of 6.69% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.50%. This indicates that USAI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| USAI | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.69% | 2.50% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.27% | 7.12% | +5.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.81% | 11.08% | +4.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.56% | 17.63% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.31% | 19.92% | +7.39% |
USAI vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
USAI has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
USAI vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
USAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than COWZ's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.16% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
USAI Pacer American Energy Independence ETF | 4.13% | 5.03% | 3.62% | 4.99% | 5.41% | 6.15% | 7.67% | 6.50% | 5.56% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
USAI and COWZ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USAI has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to COWZ (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USAI dropped -65.25% vs COWZ's -38.63%.
On 5-year performance, USAI leads with 18.67% vs 10.60% for COWZ. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USAI has performed better with a 18.67% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for USAI.
USAI has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 2.16% for COWZ.
USAI is categorized as Energy Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. USAI tracks American Energy Independence Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for USAI and 0.49% for COWZ.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for USAI and COWZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer