PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URTY vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

URTY vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

URTY vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
-2.90%45.63%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
-68.49%291.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTY achieves a -2.90% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -68.49% return.


URTY

1D
10.50%
1M
-16.23%
YTD
-2.90%
6M
-2.24%
1Y
51.62%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
-13.62%
10Y*
4.55%

HOOG

1D
12.50%
1M
-20.36%
YTD
-68.49%
6M
-83.51%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


URTY vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

URTY has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

URTY vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URTY
URTY Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
URTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
URTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTY Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTY vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URTYHOOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.74

0.30

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

0.47

+0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.15

1.00

+3.16

URTY vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTY and HOOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URTYHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

0.30

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.16

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between URTY and HOOG is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

URTY vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

URTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than HOOG's 39.05% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
URTY
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000
0.97%1.02%1.16%0.55%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.18%0.28%0.00%0.03%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
39.05%12.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

URTY vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTY drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum HOOG drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTY and HOOG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


URTYHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-86.94%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.70%

-86.94%

+49.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.03%

-85.30%

+25.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.67%

-29.96%

-4.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.86%

41.02%

-29.16%

Volatility

URTY vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro Russell2000 (URTY) is 22.37%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.72%. This indicates that URTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


URTYHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.37%

35.72%

-13.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.33%

101.26%

-57.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.68%

143.11%

-73.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.50%

143.89%

-76.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.20%

143.89%

-74.69%