PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
URTH vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

URTH vs. LLY

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net), while LLY (Eli Lilly and Company) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, URTH returned 13.38%/yr vs 33.45%/yr for LLY. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

URTH vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 5.78% return. Over the past 10 years, URTH has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 13.38%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 33.45% annualized return.

URTH

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
8.91%
6M
9.60%
1Y
24.56%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
13.38%

LLY

1D
-2.41%
1M
12.74%
YTD
5.78%
6M
10.64%
1Y
39.26%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
39.59%
10Y*
33.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URTH vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF		8.91%21.36%18.66%23.95%-17.97%22.27%15.78%28.15%-8.56%22.95%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company		5.78%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between URTH and LLY is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012

0.34

The correlation between URTH and LLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World ETF

Eli Lilly and Company

Often compared with URTH:
URTH vs. VTURTH vs. IWDA.LURTH vs. SPYURTH vs. VOOURTH vs. XWD.TOURTH vs. BRK-BURTH vs. VXUS
Often compared with LLY:
LLY vs. NVOLLY vs. UNHLLY vs. ABBVLLY vs. VOOLLY vs. XLVLLY vs. VRTXLLY vs. ISRG

Return for Risk

URTH vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URTH vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

URTHLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.85
1.07

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.55
1.62

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.22

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

1.72

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

4.28

+7.09

URTH vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URTH Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URTH and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URTH vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and LLY.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

URTHLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-68.24%

+34.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-23.64%

+14.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.94%

-34.48%

+17.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.05%

-34.48%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

-34.48%

+0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.87%

-2.41%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.37%

-19.21%

+14.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

9.49%

-7.45%

Volatility

URTH vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is 4.55%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that URTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

URTHLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

9.27%

-4.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

27.16%

-17.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.57%

38.01%

-25.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.26%

32.46%

-16.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

30.19%

-12.90%

Dividends

URTH vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than LLY's 0.57% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company		0.57%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF		1.36%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

URTH and LLY have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to URTH (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTH dropped -34.01% vs LLY's -68.24%.

URTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URTH and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer