URTH vs. IBIT
URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URTH is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net), while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URTH returned 23.64% vs -43.69% for IBIT. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. URTH charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
URTH vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a 11.55% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.17% return.
URTH
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 8.69%
- YTD
- 11.55%
- 1Y
- 23.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.26%
IBIT
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- 6M
- -18.23%
- YTD
- -27.17%
- 1Y
- -43.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.33B | $1.34B | $1.65B | |
| $88.61M | $87.13M | $139.76M |
URTH vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 11.55% | 21.36% | 18.83% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -27.17% | -6.41% | 89.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between URTH and IBIT is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URTH vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
URTH
IBIT
URTH vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URTH | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.84 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | -0.82 | +3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | -1.26 | +12.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URTH vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URTH | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.01% | -53.30% | +19.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.06% | -53.30% | +44.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -49.28% | +49.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -18.29% | +13.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 34.80% | -32.71% |
Volatility
URTH vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) is 3.77%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that URTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URTH | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 8.98% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 33.79% | -23.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 44.48% | -31.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 49.57% | -33.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 49.57% | -32.37% |
URTH vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
URTH has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
URTH vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.38% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.15% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URTH and IBIT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to URTH (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URTH dropped -34.01% vs IBIT's -53.30%.
On 1-year performance, URTH leads with 23.64% vs -43.69% for IBIT. On fees, URTH is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, URTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, URTH has performed better with a 23.64% return vs -43.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URTH is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
URTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
URTH is categorized as Global Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net), while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for URTH and 0.25% for IBIT.
URTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URTH and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer