PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URSBX vs. GPARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URSBX vs. GPARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6 (URSBX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URSBX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than GPARX's 8.20% return.


URSBX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
6.03%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*

GPARX

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
8.20%
6M
7.96%
1Y
13.29%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
3.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URSBX vs. GPARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URSBX
Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6
0.98%6.15%6.48%5.91%-2.74%1.11%4.99%5.07%1.77%2.53%
GPARX
GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund
8.20%7.42%4.20%6.87%-10.82%0.75%3.92%7.47%-1.64%4.50%

Correlation

The correlation between URSBX and GPARX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between URSBX and GPARX has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URSBX vs. GPARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URSBX
URSBX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
URSBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URSBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
URSBX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
URSBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
URSBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

GPARX
GPARX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GPARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPARX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
GPARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPARX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URSBX vs. GPARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6 (URSBX) and GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URSBXGPARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.41

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

2.85

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.66

11.91

+3.75

URSBX vs. GPARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URSBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the GPARX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URSBX and GPARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URSBX vs. GPARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URSBX drawdown since its inception was -5.57%, smaller than the maximum GPARX drawdown of -15.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URSBX and GPARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URSBXGPARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.57%

-15.56%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

-4.68%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.19%

-4.68%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.94%

-15.56%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-2.25%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-2.37%

+1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.29%

1.12%

-0.83%

Volatility

URSBX vs. GPARX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6 (URSBX) is 0.64%, while GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund (GPARX) has a volatility of 2.52%. This indicates that URSBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URSBXGPARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

2.52%

-1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.46%

6.40%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99%

6.98%

-4.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.08%

5.12%

-3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.88%

4.32%

-2.44%

URSBX vs. GPARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URSBX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than GPARX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

URSBX vs. GPARX - Dividend Comparison

URSBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than GPARX's 3.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPARX
GuidePath Absolute Return Allocation Fund
3.06%3.31%4.99%4.81%2.42%1.99%2.45%2.76%2.27%1.60%3.17%2.15%
URSBX
Victory Short-Term Bond Fund Class R6
4.76%4.74%4.57%3.31%2.61%2.86%3.53%2.96%2.85%2.18%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


URSBX and GPARX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPARX has higher volatility (2.52%) compared to URSBX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URSBX dropped -5.57% vs GPARX's -15.56%.

URSBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URSBX and GPARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer