PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNM vs. PSLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNM vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a -11.51% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's -20.51% return.


URNM

1D
-1.78%
1M
-8.06%
6M
-34.68%
YTD
-11.51%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
25.97%

PSLV

1D
-1.98%
1M
-3.34%
6M
-28.81%
YTD
-20.51%
1Y
50.16%
3Y*
31.33%
5Y*
16.13%
10Y*
8.96%
ALL TIME*
4.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$153.19M$135.68M$193.34M
$16.15M$21.14M$35.55M

URNM vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
-11.51%40.78%-14.13%57.80%-11.86%78.32%68.36%4.05%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-20.51%145.08%19.43%-1.94%2.74%-14.13%42.81%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and PSLV is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNM vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

URNM vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URNMPSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.26

1.02

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

1.99

-1.45

URNM vs. PSLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the PSLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and PSLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URNM vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and PSLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNMPSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-79.38%

+28.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-50.83%

+6.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.78%

-50.83%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

-50.83%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.17%

-48.29%

+6.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

-58.02%

+39.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.85%

25.92%

-5.07%

Volatility

URNM vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 13.67% compared to Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) at 11.59%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNMPSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.67%

11.59%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.86%

55.13%

-15.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.26%

61.20%

-7.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.65%

36.54%

+12.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.95%

31.54%

+15.41%

URNM vs. PSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLV's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

URNM vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
3.59%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


URNM and PSLV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNM has higher volatility (13.67%) compared to PSLV (11.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs PSLV's -79.38%.

On 5-year performance, PSLV leads with 16.13% vs 13.97% for URNM. On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, PSLV has been the lower-risk option at 11.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSLV has performed better with a 16.13% return vs 13.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

URNM has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.

URNM is categorized as Uranium, while PSLV is Silver. URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver). Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.51% for PSLV.

PSLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNM and PSLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer