PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URNM vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URNM vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a -7.60% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 2.39% return.


URNM

1D
4.43%
1M
-3.99%
6M
-29.26%
YTD
-7.60%
1Y
17.05%
3Y*
17.60%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.75%

IBID

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.18%
6M
2.09%
YTD
2.39%
1Y
3.56%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$770.97K$775.91K$730.76K
$16.27M$21.24M$35.62M

URNM vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
-7.60%40.78%-14.13%13.76%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
2.39%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between URNM and IBID is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

-0.01

The correlation between URNM and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URNM vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

URNM
URNM Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
URNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
URNM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
URNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
URNM Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

URNM vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URNMIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.66

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

6.50

-6.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

22.86

-22.05

URNM vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URNM and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URNM vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URNMIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.78%

-1.28%

-49.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-0.55%

-43.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.61%

-0.11%

-39.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.49%

-0.22%

-18.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.99%

0.16%

+20.83%

Volatility

URNM vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 14.41% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URNMIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.41%

0.32%

+14.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.26%

0.92%

+38.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.46%

1.16%

+52.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.70%

2.21%

+46.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.97%

2.21%

+44.76%

URNM vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

URNM vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than IBID's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
4.90%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URNM
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF
3.44%3.18%3.18%3.63%0.00%6.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


URNM and IBID have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URNM has higher volatility (14.41%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, URNM leads with 17.05% vs 3.56% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, URNM has performed better with a 17.05% return vs 3.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 3.44% for URNM.

URNM is categorized as Uranium, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URNM and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer