URNM vs. BND
URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URNM is a Uranium fund tracking the VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, URNM returned 12.61%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URNM charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
URNM vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNM achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.52% return.
URNM
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -9.26%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -0.53%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.61%
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.91%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 4.17%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.58%
URNM vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | -0.56% | 40.78% | -14.13% | 57.80% | -11.86% | 78.32% | 68.36% | 4.05% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.52% | 7.08% | 1.38% | 5.65% | -13.11% | -1.86% | 7.71% | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNM and BND is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2019 | 0.02 |
The correlation between URNM and BND shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.12 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URNM vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
URNM
BND
URNM vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URNM | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.65 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | 4.81 | -2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URNM vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNM drawdown since its inception was -50.78%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNM and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNM | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.78% | -18.58% | -32.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.72% | -2.68% | -36.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -50.78% | -5.92% | -44.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.78% | -17.91% | -32.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.02% | -2.12% | -32.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.09% | -3.06% | -15.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.78% | 0.92% | +14.86% |
Volatility
URNM vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) has a higher volatility of 17.40% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.28%. This indicates that URNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URNM | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.40% | 1.28% | +16.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.84% | 2.74% | +39.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.48% | 3.75% | +48.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.58% | 6.03% | +42.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.04% | 5.53% | +41.51% |
URNM vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNM has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
URNM vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
URNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
URNM Sprott Uranium Miners ETF | 3.19% | 3.18% | 3.18% | 3.63% | 0.00% | 6.70% | 2.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URNM and BND have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URNM has higher volatility (17.40%) compared to BND (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URNM dropped -50.78% vs BND's -18.58%.
On 5-year performance, URNM leads with 12.61% vs 0.03% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URNM has performed better with a 12.61% return vs 0.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for URNM.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 3.19% for URNM.
URNM is categorized as Uranium, while BND is Total Bond Market. URNM tracks VettaFi Global Uranium Miners Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for URNM and 0.03% for BND.
BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs 0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URNM and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer