URNJ vs. GXPE
URNJ (Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - URNJ tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. URNJ charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
URNJ vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URNJ achieves a 9.96% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 30.84% return.
URNJ
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 9.96%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 58.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPE
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.57%
- YTD
- 30.84%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URNJ vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | 9.96% | 18.45% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 30.84% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNJ and GXPE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URNJ vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
URNJ
GXPE
URNJ vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URNJ | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.32 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URNJ | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 2.15 | -1.88 |
Drawdowns
URNJ vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNJ drawdown since its inception was -59.21%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNJ and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URNJ | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.21% | -12.37% | -46.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.46% | -7.12% | -24.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.18% | -3.23% | -17.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.58% | — | — |
Volatility
URNJ vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URNJ | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.56% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.05% | 20.38% | +40.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 20.38% | +32.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.32% | 20.38% | +32.94% |
URNJ vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNJ has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
URNJ vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
URNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than GXPE's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.92% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URNJ Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF | 5.99% | 6.58% | 4.33% | 4.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URNJ and GXPE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for URNJ.
URNJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.99%, compared with 0.92% for GXPE.
URNJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Uranium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for URNJ and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for URNJ and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer