URI vs. AMAT
URI (United Rentals, Inc.) and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) are both stocks. URI operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while AMAT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, URI returned 31.88%/yr vs 38.86%/yr for AMAT. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
URI vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URI achieves a 33.31% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 121.28% return. Over the past 10 years, URI has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 31.88%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 38.86% annualized return.
URI
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 11.77%
- YTD
- 33.31%
- 6M
- 31.84%
- 1Y
- 55.90%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 29.54%
- 10Y*
- 31.88%
AMAT
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 30.08%
- YTD
- 121.28%
- 6M
- 119.38%
- 1Y
- 234.96%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 34.02%
- 10Y*
- 38.86%
URI vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URI United Rentals, Inc. | 33.31% | 15.92% | 23.97% | 63.62% | 6.96% | 43.28% | 39.06% | 62.65% | -40.36% | 62.82% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 121.28% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between URI and AMAT is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1997 | 0.37 |
The correlation between URI and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
URI:
$52.01
AMAT:
$10.61
URI:
20.66
AMAT:
53.45
URI:
0.99
AMAT:
6.80
URI:
3.16
AMAT:
15.67
URI:
$16.37B
AMAT:
$29.02B
URI:
$5.93B
AMAT:
$14.21B
URI:
$5.85B
AMAT:
$9.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URI vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
URI
AMAT
URI vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Rentals, Inc. (URI) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URI | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.59 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 10.67 | -8.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 30.41 | -26.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URI vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URI drawdown since its inception was -93.69%, which is greater than AMAT's maximum drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URI and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URI | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.69% | -85.22% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.04% | -21.37% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.03% | -49.88% | +12.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.96% | -55.14% | +15.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.26% | -55.14% | -8.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.82% | 0.00% | -1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.54% | -38.78% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.97% | 7.49% | +6.48% |
Volatility
URI vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is 9.85%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 20.52%. This indicates that URI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URI | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 20.52% | -10.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.70% | 38.83% | -4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.83% | 49.03% | -7.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.88% | 44.20% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.39% | 42.94% | -0.55% |
Dividends
URI vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
URI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than AMAT's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
URI United Rentals, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.88% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
URI vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Rentals, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
URI vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
URI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Rentals, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.47B and revenue of 3.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
URI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Rentals, Inc. reported an operating income of 869.00M and revenue of 3.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
URI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Rentals, Inc. reported a net income of 531.00M and revenue of 3.99B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
URI and AMAT have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMAT has higher volatility (20.52%) compared to URI (9.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URI dropped -93.69% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.65 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URI and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer