PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URFRX vs. SSBRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URFRX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly higher than SSBRX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, URFRX has outperformed SSBRX with an annualized return of 9.49%, while SSBRX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.95% annualized return.


URFRX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.51%
YTD
10.90%
6M
11.46%
1Y
23.08%
3Y*
16.28%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
9.49%

SSBRX

1D
0.15%
1M
2.05%
YTD
6.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
11.97%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
7.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
10.90%17.49%10.37%16.75%-14.86%15.88%9.22%19.57%-8.52%18.48%
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
6.74%12.93%8.73%13.61%-15.51%10.03%14.68%20.73%-5.47%14.32%

Correlation

The correlation between URFRX and SSBRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014

0.95

The correlation between URFRX and SSBRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URFRX vs. SSBRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URFRX
URFRX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
URFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
URFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

SSBRX
SSBRX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SSBRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSBRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSBRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SSBRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSBRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) and State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


URFRXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.91

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

4.22

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.58

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.58

-0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.89

16.33

-1.43

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the SSBRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URFRX and SSBRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


URFRXSSBRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.91

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.62

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.81

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.74

-0.21

Drawdowns

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URFRX drawdown since its inception was -39.33%, which is greater than SSBRX's maximum drawdown of -21.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URFRX and SSBRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URFRXSSBRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.33%

-21.96%

-17.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.88%

-4.44%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.41%

-7.48%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.27%

-21.13%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.59%

-21.96%

-6.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-3.72%

-1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

0.97%

+0.60%

Volatility

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund (URFRX) has a higher volatility of 3.03% compared to State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund (SSBRX) at 1.74%. This indicates that URFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSBRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URFRXSSBRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

1.74%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

4.36%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.41%

5.48%

+3.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.33%

8.83%

+3.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.08%

9.82%

+3.26%

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URFRX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than SSBRX's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

URFRX vs. SSBRX - Dividend Comparison

URFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.36%, more than SSBRX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SSBRX
State Street Target Retirement 2025 Fund
5.68%6.07%6.67%4.60%6.60%6.44%4.74%6.58%5.35%0.60%1.84%2.38%
URFRX
USAA Target Retirement 2040 Fund
6.36%7.05%2.78%3.94%10.68%7.78%5.49%12.74%9.99%6.53%3.95%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, URFRX and SSBRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URFRX has higher volatility (3.03%) compared to SSBRX (1.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URFRX dropped -39.33% vs SSBRX's -21.96%.

SSBRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URFRX and SSBRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer