URE vs. MUU
URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while MUU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion. URE is passively managed, while MUU is actively managed. Over the past year, URE returned 8.16% vs 6522.95% for MUU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URE charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MUU.
Performance
URE vs. MUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 961.23% return.
URE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
MUU
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 218.90%
- YTD
- 961.23%
- 6M
- 1,422.01%
- 1Y
- 6,522.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URE vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 13.97% | -3.65% | -10.74% |
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 961.23% | 599.03% | -43.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between URE and MUU is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2024 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URE vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank
URE
MUU
URE vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URE | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -50.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.91 | -0.84 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 125.85 | -125.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 426.84 | -425.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URE | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 50.40 | -50.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 6.68 | -6.75 |
Drawdowns
URE vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and MUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URE | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -75.07% | -22.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -52.72% | +36.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.68% | 0.00% | -52.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.52% | -23.44% | -41.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 15.51% | -8.68% |
Volatility
URE vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) is 7.56%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 54.78%. This indicates that URE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URE | MUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 54.78% | -47.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 105.07% | -85.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.73% | 131.77% | -105.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.28% | 133.67% | -96.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.53% | 133.67% | -93.14% |
URE vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
URE vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison
URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than MUU's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares | 0.46% | 4.27% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.05% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URE and MUU have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MUU has higher volatility (54.78%) compared to URE (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs MUU's -75.07%.
On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 6522.95% vs 8.16% for URE. On fees, URE is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, URE has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 6522.95% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
URE is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MUU.
URE has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 0.46% for MUU.
URE is categorized as REIT, while MUU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 1.06% for MUU.
MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (50.40 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URE and MUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer