URE vs. GQRE
URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and GQRE (FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund) are both REIT funds - URE tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%) while GQRE tracks the Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URE returned 2.80%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for GQRE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. URE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GQRE.
Performance
URE vs. GQRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than GQRE's 7.34% return. Over the past 10 years, URE has underperformed GQRE with an annualized return of 2.80%, while GQRE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.78% annualized return.
URE
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -2.94%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 8.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
GQRE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 7.63%
- 1Y
- 11.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.78%
URE vs. GQRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 13.97% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 7.34% | 8.27% | 6.09% | 9.21% | -27.22% | 32.01% | -9.17% | 21.84% | -8.88% | 13.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between URE and GQRE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between URE and GQRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
URE vs. GQRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
URE
GQRE
Real Estate
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
URE
GQRE
Financial Services
URE
GQRE
Basic Materials
URE
GQRE
Communication Services
URE
-
GQRE
Consumer Cyclical
URE
-
GQRE
Consumer Defensive
URE
-
GQRE
Energy
URE
-
GQRE
-
Healthcare
URE
-
GQRE
Industrials
URE
-
GQRE
Technology
URE
-
GQRE
Utilities
URE
-
GQRE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URE vs. GQRE — Risk / Return Rank
URE
GQRE
URE vs. GQRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URE | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.18 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 1.16 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 4.42 | -3.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URE | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 1.01 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 | 0.12 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.21 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.30 | -0.36 |
Drawdowns
URE vs. GQRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than GQRE's maximum drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and GQRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URE | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -41.87% | -55.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -10.15% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.77% | -16.17% | -17.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.66% | -35.08% | -28.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.49% | -41.87% | -28.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.68% | -3.43% | -49.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.52% | -9.24% | -55.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.83% | 2.66% | +4.17% |
Volatility
URE vs. GQRE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) at 3.53%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URE | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 3.53% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.29% | 8.77% | +10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.73% | 11.64% | +15.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.28% | 16.45% | +20.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.53% | 17.66% | +22.87% |
URE vs. GQRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GQRE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
URE vs. GQRE - Dividend Comparison
URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than GQRE's 4.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 4.36% | 4.75% | 3.77% | 2.91% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 4.29% | 3.22% | 1.97% | 4.16% | 2.32% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.05% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, URE and GQRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
URE has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to GQRE (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs GQRE's -41.87%.
On 10-year performance, GQRE leads with 3.78% vs 2.80% for URE. On fees, GQRE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GQRE has performed better with a 3.78% return vs 2.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GQRE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.36%, compared with 2.05% for URE.
URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while GQRE tracks Northern Trust Global Quality Real Estate (NR). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 0.45% for GQRE.
GQRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URE and GQRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer