URE vs. COMT
URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URE returned 2.02%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for COMT. Their 0.12 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. URE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
URE vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 22.49% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 31.11% return. Over the past 10 years, URE has underperformed COMT with an annualized return of 2.02%, while COMT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.00% annualized return.
URE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- YTD
- 22.49%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.91%
- 5Y*
- -4.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.07%
COMT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 8.11%
- 6M
- 19.02%
- YTD
- 31.11%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.08M | $10.46M | $14.41M | |
| $671.44K | $397.42K | $253.68K |
URE vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 22.49% | -3.65% | 0.35% | 11.58% | -49.64% | 88.24% | -28.06% | 57.86% | -13.80% | 16.56% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 31.11% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | 19.45% | 36.88% | -18.66% | 10.81% | -6.67% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between URE and COMT is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014 | 0.12 |
The correlation between URE and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URE vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
URE
COMT
URE vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 1.82 | -0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.86 | 5.69 | -2.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URE vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -51.89% | -45.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.50% | -17.57% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.77% | -17.57% | -16.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.66% | -29.00% | -34.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.49% | -39.22% | -31.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.14% | -10.65% | -38.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.38% | -23.90% | -40.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 5.63% | +0.37% |
Volatility
URE vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 8.85% compared to iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) at 5.08%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.85% | 5.08% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.09% | 19.62% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.19% | 21.67% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.50% | 21.10% | +16.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.68% | 18.86% | +21.82% |
URE vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
URE vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than COMT's 5.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.90% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 1.99% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URE and COMT have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URE has higher volatility (8.85%) compared to COMT (5.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 10-year performance, COMT leads with 9.00% vs 2.02% for URE. On fees, COMT is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, COMT has been the lower-risk option at 5.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COMT has performed better with a 9.00% return vs 2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COMT is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 1.99% for URE.
URE is categorized as REIT, while COMT is Commodities. URE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 0.48% for COMT.
COMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URE and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer