URE vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URE (ProShares Ultra Real Estate) and CLOZ (Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URE is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%), while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. URE is passively managed, while CLOZ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, URE returned 8.96%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URE charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

URE vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 13.97% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's 2.53% return.

URE

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -2.94%
• YTD: 13.97%
• 6M: 11.99%
• 1Y: 8.16%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: -4.07%
• 10Y*: 2.80%

CLOZ

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 3.13%
• 1Y: 6.21%
• 3Y*: 10.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URE vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate	13.97%	-3.65%	0.35%	-1.81%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	2.53%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between URE and CLOZ is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023	0.14

Return for Risk

URE vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URE

URE Risk / Return Rank: 14
URE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
URE Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
URE Omega Ratio Rank: 13
URE Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
URE Martin Ratio Rank: 15

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 47
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URE vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URE	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.31	1.81	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	2.31	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.46	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	1.60	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.20	5.31	-4.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URE vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URE Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URE and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URE	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31	1.81	-1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	2.77	-2.83

Drawdowns

URE vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	URE	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.16%	-5.32%	-91.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.50%	-3.90%	-12.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.77%	-5.32%	-28.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.49%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.68%	-0.12%	-52.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.52%	-0.38%	-64.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.83%	1.17%	+5.66%

Volatility

URE vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.42%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URE	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.56%	0.42%	+7.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.29%	3.13%	+16.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.73%	3.45%	+23.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.28%	3.80%	+33.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.53%	3.80%	+36.73%

URE vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

URE vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than CLOZ's 7.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.39%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate	2.05%	2.42%	2.09%	1.32%	1.26%	0.58%	0.94%	1.10%	1.53%	0.93%	0.96%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URE and CLOZ in my portfolio?

URE and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URE or CLOZ?

URE has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to CLOZ (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URE dropped -97.16% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which ETF is better, URE or CLOZ?

On 3-year performance, CLOZ leads with 10.62% vs 8.96% for URE. On fees, CLOZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, CLOZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URE or CLOZ?

Over the 3-year period, CLOZ has performed better with a 10.62% return vs 8.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URE or CLOZ?

CLOZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for URE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URE or CLOZ?

CLOZ has the higher dividend yield at 7.39%, compared with 2.05% for URE.

What is the main difference between URE and CLOZ?

URE is categorized as REIT, while CLOZ is CLO. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Panagram. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for URE and 0.50% for CLOZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.