URE vs. CLOZ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ).
URE and CLOZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URE is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. CLOZ is an actively managed fund by Panagram. It was launched on Jan 23, 2023.
Performance
URE vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
URE vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.38% | -3.65% | 0.35% | -1.81% |
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF | -1.42% | 5.99% | 11.85% | 14.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URE achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than CLOZ's -1.42% return.
URE
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -12.45%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 6M
- -5.82%
- 1Y
- -6.19%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- -2.54%
- 10Y*
- 1.93%
CLOZ
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- -1.42%
- 6M
- -0.20%
- 1Y
- 4.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URE vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
URE has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
URE vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank
URE
CLOZ
URE vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URE | CLOZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | 0.85 | -1.05 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | 1.13 | -1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.24 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.23 | -1.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 3.89 | -4.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URE | CLOZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 0.85 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 2.55 | -2.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between URE and CLOZ is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
URE vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison
URE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than CLOZ's 7.93% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URE ProShares Ultra Real Estate | 2.29% | 2.42% | 2.09% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 0.58% | 0.94% | 1.10% | 1.53% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 0.81% |
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF | 7.93% | 7.63% | 9.09% | 8.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
URE vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URE drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URE and CLOZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| URE | CLOZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -5.32% | -91.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -3.90% | -19.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.49% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.49% | -2.66% | -54.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.63% | -0.37% | -64.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.62% | 1.23% | +6.39% |
Volatility
URE vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Real Estate (URE) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 1.37%. This indicates that URE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| URE | CLOZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 1.37% | +7.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.04% | 2.94% | +16.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.48% | 5.50% | +26.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.23% | 3.83% | +33.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.49% | 3.83% | +36.66% |