PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URBN vs. DDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

URBN vs. DDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) and Dillard's, Inc. (DDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URBN achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than DDS's 0.66% return. Over the past 10 years, URBN has underperformed DDS with an annualized return of 11.50%, while DDS has yielded a comparatively higher 30.59% annualized return.


URBN

1D
-0.49%
1M
15.95%
YTD
2.31%
6M
-5.91%
1Y
11.32%
3Y*
31.92%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
11.50%

DDS

1D
-0.70%
1M
14.47%
YTD
0.66%
6M
-10.45%
1Y
58.44%
3Y*
27.17%
5Y*
35.97%
10Y*
30.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URBN vs. DDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URBN
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
2.31%37.14%53.77%49.64%-18.77%14.69%-7.81%-16.36%-5.31%23.10%
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
0.66%46.81%13.47%32.05%38.66%306.41%-12.71%22.76%0.97%-3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between URBN and DDS is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 1993

0.39

The correlation between URBN and DDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

URBN:

$6.84B

DDS:

$9.52B

EPS

URBN:

$5.18

DDS:

$42.07

PE Ratio

URBN:

14.85

DDS:

14.50

PS Ratio

URBN:

1.11

DDS:

1.45

PB Ratio

URBN:

2.62

DDS:

3.66

Total Revenue (TTM)

URBN:

$6.32B

DDS:

$6.58B

Gross Profit (TTM)

URBN:

$2.27B

DDS:

$1.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

URBN:

$603.32M

DDS:

$985.80M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URBN vs. DDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URBN
URBN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
URBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
URBN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
URBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
URBN Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

DDS
DDS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
DDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDS Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URBN vs. DDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) and Dillard's, Inc. (DDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URBNDDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.27

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

2.42

-1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.82

5.60

-4.77

URBN vs. DDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URBN Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the DDS Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URBN and DDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URBN vs. DDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URBN drawdown since its inception was -83.96%, smaller than the maximum DDS drawdown of -93.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URBN and DDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URBNDDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.96%

-93.62%

+9.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.32%

-24.27%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.53%

-42.02%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.36%

-49.71%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.80%

-76.57%

+2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.89%

-12.84%

+5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.55%

-35.61%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.77%

10.47%

+3.30%

Volatility

URBN vs. DDS - Volatility Comparison

Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) and Dillard's, Inc. (DDS) have volatilities of 10.59% and 10.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URBNDDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.59%

10.15%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.72%

27.84%

+0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.59%

39.57%

+4.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.28%

50.28%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.75%

59.53%

-10.78%

Dividends

URBN vs. DDS - Dividend Comparison

URBN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDS
Dillard's, Inc.
5.11%5.13%6.02%5.18%4.89%6.41%0.95%0.68%0.66%0.57%0.45%0.40%
URBN
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

URBN vs. DDS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Dillard's, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B2.00B2.20B20222023202420252026
1.48B
1.57B
(URBN) Total Revenue
(DDS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

URBN vs. DDS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Urban Outfitters, Inc. and Dillard's, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
36.6%
0
Portfolio components
URBN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a gross profit of 542.57M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.6%.

DDS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

URBN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported an operating income of 139.68M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

DDS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

URBN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Urban Outfitters, Inc. reported a net income of 115.71M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.

DDS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dillard's, Inc. reported a net income of 250.60M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


URBN and DDS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URBN has higher volatility (10.59%) compared to DDS (10.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URBN dropped -83.96% vs DDS's -93.62%.

DDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URBN and DDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer