URAN vs. AMZN
URAN (Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the BITA Global Uranium and Nuclear Select Index, while AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, URAN returned 28.74% vs 21.54% for AMZN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
URAN vs. AMZN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URAN achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than AMZN's 8.32% return.
URAN
- 1D
- -3.96%
- 1M
- -5.96%
- YTD
- 5.17%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 28.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZN
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- -8.10%
- YTD
- 8.32%
- 6M
- 7.59%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 21.29%
URAN vs. AMZN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 5.17% | 49.05% | 4.09% |
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 8.32% | 5.21% | 13.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between URAN and AMZN is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URAN vs. AMZN — Risk / Return Rank
URAN
AMZN
URAN vs. AMZN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) and Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URAN | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.15 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.14 | 1.00 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | 2.39 | -0.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URAN | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.72 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.57 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
URAN vs. AMZN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URAN drawdown since its inception was -31.96%, smaller than the maximum AMZN drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAN and AMZN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URAN | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -94.40% | +62.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.31% | -21.74% | -3.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -30.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.16% | -9.08% | -11.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.75% | -28.12% | +17.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 9.02% | +3.69% |
Volatility
URAN vs. AMZN - Volatility Comparison
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) at 7.24%. This indicates that URAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URAN | AMZN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.29% | 7.24% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.33% | 20.35% | +8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.47% | 30.00% | +9.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.13% | 35.50% | +3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.13% | 32.46% | +6.67% |
Dividends
URAN vs. AMZN - Dividend Comparison
URAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, while AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URAN Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF | 2.44% | 2.56% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URAN and AMZN have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URAN has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to AMZN (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAN dropped -31.96% vs AMZN's -94.40%.
URAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URAN and AMZN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer