URAA vs. XDSQ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

URAA (Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URAA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive United States Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF Select Index (200%), while XDSQ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Innovator. URAA is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. Over the past year, URAA returned -9.13% vs 14.35% for XDSQ. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URAA charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.

Performance

URAA vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a -28.16% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 3.80% return.

URAA

• 1D: -9.96%
• 1M: -20.39%
• 6M: -49.06%
• YTD: -28.16%
• 1Y: -9.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XDSQ

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 0.79%
• 6M: 2.05%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 1Y: 14.35%
• 3Y*: 14.24%
• 5Y*: 9.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URAA vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
URAA Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares	-28.16%	88.33%	-25.73%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	3.80%	14.22%	10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between URAA and XDSQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2024	0.50

The correlation between URAA and XDSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

URAA vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	URAA	XDSQ
Energy	62.5%	3.1%
Industrials	17.0%	7.8%
Utilities	16.6%	2.1%
Basic Materials	2.9%	1.7%
Technology	1.0%	39.1%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Financial Services	-	10.9%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Real Estate	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

URAA vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URAA

URAA Risk / Return Rank: 10
URAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
URAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
URAA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
URAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
URAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8

XDSQ

XDSQ Risk / Return Rank: 49
XDSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
XDSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
XDSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XDSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
XDSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URAA vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	URAA	XDSQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	1.37	-1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.56	1.90	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.28	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	1.50	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.28	7.16	-7.44

URAA vs. XDSQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the XDSQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URAA and XDSQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

URAA vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and XDSQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	URAA	XDSQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.45%	-26.06%	-41.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.83%	-9.60%	-54.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.15%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.83%	-0.49%	-63.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.69%	-4.87%	-23.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.53%	2.01%	+30.52%

Volatility

URAA vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) has a higher volatility of 23.10% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 1.42%. This indicates that URAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URAA	XDSQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.10%	1.42%	+21.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	72.99%	7.91%	+65.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	96.41%	10.55%	+85.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	89.18%	15.27%	+73.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	89.18%	14.96%	+74.22%

URAA vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

URAA vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison

URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
URAA Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares	14.02%	9.14%	4.36%
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URAA and XDSQ in my portfolio?

URAA and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URAA or XDSQ?

URAA has higher volatility (23.10%) compared to XDSQ (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.

Which ETF is better, URAA or XDSQ?

On 1-year performance, XDSQ leads with 14.35% vs -9.13% for URAA. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URAA or XDSQ?

Over the 1-year period, XDSQ has performed better with a 14.35% return vs -9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URAA or XDSQ?

XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URAA or XDSQ?

URAA has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.

What is the main difference between URAA and XDSQ?

URAA is categorized as Uranium, while XDSQ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 0.79% for XDSQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.