URAA vs. XDSQ
URAA (Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. URAA is passively managed, while XDSQ is actively managed. Over the past year, URAA returned 69.53% vs 16.08% for XDSQ. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URAA charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
URAA vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URAA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than XDSQ's 2.84% return.
URAA
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- 1Y
- 69.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 16.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.08%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- —
URAA vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URAA Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares | 10.16% | 88.33% | -26.53% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 2.84% | 14.22% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between URAA and XDSQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024 | 0.49 |
URAA vs. XDSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
URAA
XDSQ
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
URAA
XDSQ
Industrials
URAA
XDSQ
Utilities
URAA
XDSQ
Basic Materials
URAA
XDSQ
Technology
URAA
XDSQ
Communication Services
URAA
-
XDSQ
Consumer Cyclical
URAA
-
XDSQ
Consumer Defensive
URAA
-
XDSQ
Financial Services
URAA
-
XDSQ
Healthcare
URAA
-
XDSQ
Real Estate
URAA
-
XDSQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URAA vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
URAA
XDSQ
URAA vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URAA | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.68 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 8.02 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URAA | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.53 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.69 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
URAA vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URAA drawdown since its inception was -67.45%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URAA and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URAA | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.45% | -26.06% | -41.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.91% | -9.60% | -40.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.53% | 0.00% | -44.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.30% | -4.96% | -22.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.19% | 2.01% | +25.18% |
Volatility
URAA vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares (URAA) has a higher volatility of 28.36% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 0.53%. This indicates that URAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URAA | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.36% | 0.53% | +27.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 72.56% | 8.39% | +64.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.12% | 10.54% | +83.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.87% | 15.27% | +73.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.87% | 15.09% | +73.78% |
URAA vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
URAA has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
URAA vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
URAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.24%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
URAA Direxion Daily Uranium Industry Bull 2X Shares | 9.24% | 9.14% | 4.36% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URAA and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URAA has higher volatility (28.36%) compared to XDSQ (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URAA dropped -67.45% vs XDSQ's -26.06%.
On 1-year performance, URAA leads with 69.53% vs 16.08% for XDSQ. On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XDSQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, URAA has performed better with a 69.53% return vs 16.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for URAA.
URAA has the higher dividend yield at 9.24%, compared with 0.00% for XDSQ.
They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for URAA and 0.79% for XDSQ.
XDSQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URAA and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer