URA vs. URNP.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L).

URA and URNP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010. URNP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD. It was launched on May 3, 2022. Both URA and URNP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

URA vs. URNP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

URA vs. URNP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
URA Global X Uranium ETF	15.28%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-7.89%
URNP.L HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc	23.23%	43.05%	-13.51%	58.59%	-11.59%

Different Trading Currencies

URA is traded in USD, while URNP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the URNP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly lower than URNP.L's 23.23% return.

URA

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -12.74%
• YTD: 15.28%
• 6M: 6.95%
• 1Y: 123.62%
• 3Y*: 41.34%
• 5Y*: 25.08%
• 10Y*: 16.67%

URNP.L

• 1D: 6.07%
• 1M: -10.97%
• YTD: 23.23%
• 6M: 18.12%
• 1Y: 117.18%
• 3Y*: 34.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. URNP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than URNP.L's 0.85% expense ratio.

URNP.L

HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc

URA

Global X Uranium ETF

Return for Risk

URA vs. URNP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 92
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 86

URNP.L

URNP.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
URNP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
URNP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
URNP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 87
URNP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
URNP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. URNP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URA	URNP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.45	+0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.91	+0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.38	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.40	4.65	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.53	11.64	-1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URA vs. URNP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the URNP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and URNP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URA	URNP.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.45	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.52	-0.57

Correlation

The correlation between URA and URNP.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

URA vs. URNP.L - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, while URNP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.23%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%
URNP.L HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

URA vs. URNP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than URNP.L's maximum drawdown of -50.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and URNP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	URA	URNP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-51.01%	-42.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.43%	-23.65%	-4.78%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.10%	-13.60%	-30.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.40%	-17.94%	-57.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.89%	9.24%	+2.65%

Volatility

URA vs. URNP.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) have volatilities of 14.44% and 14.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URA	URNP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.44%	14.18%	+0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.51%	37.53%	+0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.22%	47.56%	+1.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.97%	41.33%	+1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.22%	41.33%	-4.11%