URNP.L vs. NUCG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L).
URNP.L and NUCG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URNP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD. It was launched on May 3, 2022. NUCG.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MarketVector Global Uranium and Nuclear Energy Infrastructure. It was launched on Feb 3, 2023. Both URNP.L and NUCG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URNP.L or NUCG.L.
Key characteristics
| URNP.L | NUCG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -4.53% | 42.04% |
| 1Y Return | -2.67% | 43.74% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.09 | 1.07 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.15 | 1.76 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.02 | 1.27 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.08 | 2.03 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.18 | 4.16 |
| Ulcer Index | 17.70% | 10.70% |
| Daily Std Dev | 36.81% | 41.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.62% | -21.97% |
| Current Drawdown | -22.72% | -1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between URNP.L and NUCG.L is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
URNP.L vs. NUCG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, URNP.L achieves a -4.53% return, which is significantly lower than NUCG.L's 42.04% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URNP.L vs. NUCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
URNP.L has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NUCG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URNP.L vs. NUCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URNP.L vs. NUCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither URNP.L nor NUCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
URNP.L vs. NUCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URNP.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, which is greater than NUCG.L's maximum drawdown of -21.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URNP.L and NUCG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URNP.L vs. NUCG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) is 11.31%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear Technologies UCITS ETF (NUCG.L) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that URNP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.