PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URA vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URA vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -15.74% return.


URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-13.30%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%

UBER

1D
-1.01%
1M
-8.31%
YTD
-15.74%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
6.53%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-2.46%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-15.74%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and UBER is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URA vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAUBERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.92

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

-0.62

+1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

-1.09

+3.40

URA vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URA vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-68.05%

-25.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.48%

-31.46%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

-31.46%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

-60.45%

+22.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.34%

-31.22%

-17.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-25.67%

-49.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

17.93%

-3.81%

Volatility

URA vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 7.96%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

7.96%

+9.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.95%

23.21%

+16.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

32.66%

+18.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.96%

44.82%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.91%

50.61%

-12.70%

Dividends

URA vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


URA and UBER have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to UBER (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs UBER's -68.05%.

URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer