PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
URA vs. TURF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

URA vs. TURF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and TURF (T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for TURF.

Performance

URA vs. TURF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly lower than TURF's 19.55% return.

URA

1D
-5.67%
1M
-8.00%
YTD
17.93%
6M
13.25%
1Y
61.26%
3Y*
39.27%
5Y*
21.39%
10Y*
17.12%

TURF

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.33%
YTD
19.55%
6M
22.12%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. TURF - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		17.93%24.33%
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF		19.55%17.05%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and TURF is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.50

URA vs. TURF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
URA
TURF

Energy

57.0%
29.2%

Industrials

21.9%
1.6%

Utilities

9.4%
0.3%

Basic Materials

5.0%
33.9%

Technology

0.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

-

3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

8.5%

Financial Services

-

2.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

URA
57.0%
TURF
29.2%

Industrials

URA
21.9%
TURF
1.6%

Utilities

URA
9.4%
TURF
0.3%

Basic Materials

URA
5.0%
TURF
33.9%

Technology

URA
0.9%
TURF
0.4%

Communication Services

URA

-

TURF
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

URA

-

TURF

-

Consumer Defensive

URA

-

TURF
8.5%

Financial Services

URA

-

TURF
2.3%

Healthcare

URA

-

TURF

-

Real Estate

URA

-

TURF

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Uranium ETF

T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF

Often compared with URA:
URA vs. NLRURA vs. URNMURA vs. NUKZURA vs. CCJURA vs. UUUUURA vs. URANURA vs. U-U.TO
Often compared with TURF:
TURF vs. BATTTURF vs. LIMITURF vs. URNMTURF vs. GNRTURF vs. FTRITURF vs. NRESTURF vs. COPP

Return for Risk

URA vs. TURF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
TURF
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. TURF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF (TURF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

URATURFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.23

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.86

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.58

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URA vs. TURF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

URATURFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

2.52

-2.57

Drawdowns

URA vs. TURF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than TURF's maximum drawdown of -6.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and TURF.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

URATURFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-6.84%

-86.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.43%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.81%

-2.54%

-40.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.01%

-1.53%

-73.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.40%

—

—

Volatility

URA vs. TURF - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

URATURFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.94%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.29%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.19%

16.50%

+33.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.62%

16.50%

+27.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.73%

16.50%

+21.23%

URA vs. TURF - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than TURF's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

URA vs. TURF - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than TURF's 1.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TURF
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF		1.25%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		4.14%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

URA and TURF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TURF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TURF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 1.25% for TURF.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.44% for TURF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and TURF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer