PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URA vs. REAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URA vs. REAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and The RealReal, Inc. (REAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than REAL's -34.85% return.


URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%

REAL

1D
4.47%
1M
9.25%
YTD
-34.85%
6M
-28.31%
1Y
92.87%
3Y*
81.13%
5Y*
-12.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. REAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
6.53%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-6.77%
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.
-34.85%44.37%443.78%60.80%-89.23%-40.58%3.66%-32.68%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and REAL is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URA vs. REAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

REAL
REAL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
REAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
REAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
REAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
REAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. REAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and The RealReal, Inc. (REAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAREALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.25

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.80

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

3.95

-1.64

URA vs. REAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the REAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and REAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URA vs. REAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, roughly equal to the maximum REAL drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and REAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAREALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-96.44%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.48%

-51.95%

+20.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

-57.16%

+19.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

-95.42%

+57.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.34%

-64.43%

+16.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-67.33%

-7.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

23.62%

-9.50%

Volatility

URA vs. REAL - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and The RealReal, Inc. (REAL) have volatilities of 17.69% and 17.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAREALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

17.24%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.95%

48.58%

-8.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

77.43%

-26.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.96%

97.37%

-53.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.91%

93.85%

-55.94%

Dividends

URA vs. REAL - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while REAL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REAL
The RealReal, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


URA and REAL have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to REAL (17.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs REAL's -96.44%.

REAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and REAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer