URA vs. PROSY
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while PROSY (Prosus N.V.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, URA returned 18.77%/yr vs -0.56%/yr for PROSY. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
URA vs. PROSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than PROSY's -26.62% return.
URA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -13.30%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
PROSY
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -26.62%
- 6M
- -27.15%
- 1Y
- -15.15%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- -0.56%
- 10Y*
- —
URA vs. PROSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.53% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | 0.45% |
PROSY Prosus N.V. | -26.62% | 55.67% | 33.80% | -5.32% | -17.15% | -23.28% | 45.77% | -9.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and PROSY is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. PROSY — Risk / Return Rank
URA
PROSY
URA vs. PROSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Prosus N.V. (PROSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URA | PROSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.93 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.44 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | -0.81 | +3.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URA vs. PROSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than PROSY's maximum drawdown of -69.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and PROSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | PROSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -69.36% | -24.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.48% | -39.09% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | -39.09% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | -60.96% | +23.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.34% | -37.79% | -10.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -30.01% | -44.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | 21.26% | -7.14% |
Volatility
URA vs. PROSY - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Prosus N.V. (PROSY) at 13.50%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PROSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | PROSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.69% | 13.50% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.95% | 27.41% | +12.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 32.46% | +18.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.96% | 43.10% | +0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 41.64% | -3.73% |
Dividends
URA vs. PROSY - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while PROSY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PROSY Prosus N.V. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.25% | 0.20% | 0.20% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and PROSY have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to PROSY (13.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs PROSY's -69.36%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and PROSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer