URA vs. PGY
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while PGY (Pagaya Technologies Ltd.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, URA returned 32.17%/yr vs 1.47%/yr for PGY. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
URA vs. PGY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than PGY's -26.22% return.
URA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -13.30%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
PGY
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- -26.22%
- 6M
- -32.07%
- 1Y
- -14.05%
- 3Y*
- 1.47%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA vs. PGY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.53% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | 8.92% |
PGY Pagaya Technologies Ltd. | -26.22% | 124.97% | -43.90% | 11.29% | -82.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and PGY is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2022 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. PGY — Risk / Return Rank
URA
PGY
URA vs. PGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URA | PGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.03 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.22 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | -0.33 | +2.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URA vs. PGY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, roughly equal to the maximum PGY drawdown of -98.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and PGY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | PGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -98.09% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.48% | -75.71% | +44.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | -75.71% | +37.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.34% | -95.71% | +47.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -92.10% | +17.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | 49.48% | -35.36% |
Volatility
URA vs. PGY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is 17.69%, while Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (PGY) has a volatility of 23.48%. This indicates that URA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | PGY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.69% | 23.48% | -5.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.95% | 56.92% | -16.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 80.20% | -28.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.96% | 144.65% | -100.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 144.65% | -106.74% |
Dividends
URA vs. PGY - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while PGY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGY Pagaya Technologies Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and PGY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGY has higher volatility (23.48%) compared to URA (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs PGY's -98.09%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and PGY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer