URA vs. LIMI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and LIMI (Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF) are both Commodity Producers Equities funds - URA tracks the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index while LIMI tracks the BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URA returned 61.26% vs 160.78% for LIMI. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LIMI.

Performance

URA vs. LIMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 17.93% return, which is significantly lower than LIMI's 19.24% return.

URA

• 1D: -5.67%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: 17.93%
• 6M: 13.25%
• 1Y: 61.26%
• 3Y*: 39.27%
• 5Y*: 21.39%
• 10Y*: 17.12%

LIMI

• 1D: -2.97%
• 1M: -7.76%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 32.07%
• 1Y: 160.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. LIMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
URA Global X Uranium ETF	17.93%	67.18%	-4.59%
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF	19.24%	91.22%	-1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and LIMI is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

URA vs. LIMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 34
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

LIMI

LIMI Risk / Return Rank: 89
LIMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LIMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
LIMI Omega Ratio Rank: 81
LIMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LIMI Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. LIMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	URA	LIMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.23	3.71	-2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	3.82	-1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.48	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	7.03	-4.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.58	21.57	-16.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

URA vs. LIMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the LIMI Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and LIMI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	URA	LIMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.23	3.71	-2.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	1.50	-1.55

Drawdowns

URA vs. LIMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than LIMI's maximum drawdown of -43.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and LIMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	URA	LIMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.54%	-43.77%	-49.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.43%	-23.00%	-5.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-37.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.81%	-11.69%	-31.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-75.01%	-13.02%	-61.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.40%	7.48%	+5.92%

Volatility

URA vs. LIMI - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 15.94% compared to Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF (LIMI) at 9.74%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	URA	LIMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.94%	9.74%	+6.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.29%	29.23%	+9.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.19%	43.66%	+6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.62%	41.41%	+2.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.73%	41.41%	-3.68%

URA vs. LIMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than LIMI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

URA vs. LIMI - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than LIMI's 0.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LIMI Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF	0.45%	0.54%	8.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.14%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both URA and LIMI in my portfolio?

URA and LIMI have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, URA or LIMI?

URA has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to LIMI (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs LIMI's -43.77%.

Which ETF is better, URA or LIMI?

On 1-year performance, LIMI leads with 160.78% vs 61.26% for URA. On fees, LIMI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, LIMI has been the lower-risk option at 9.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, URA or LIMI?

Over the 1-year period, LIMI has performed better with a 160.78% return vs 61.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, URA or LIMI?

LIMI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, URA or LIMI?

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.14%, compared with 0.45% for LIMI.

What is the main difference between URA and LIMI?

URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while LIMI tracks BITA Global Lithium and Battery Metals Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.35% for LIMI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.