URA vs. ISHG
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and ISHG (iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while ISHG is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US 1-3 Year. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 15.90%/yr vs -0.14%/yr for ISHG. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ISHG.
Performance
URA vs. ISHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than ISHG's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed ISHG with an annualized return of 15.90%, while ISHG has yielded a comparatively lower -0.14% annualized return.
URA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -8.83%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
ISHG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 1.37%
- 3Y*
- 4.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.07%
- 10Y*
- -0.14%
URA vs. ISHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.53% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | -3.54% | -22.11% | 19.36% |
ISHG iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF | -0.18% | 13.31% | -4.16% | 3.76% | -10.95% | -7.05% | 7.47% | -0.64% | -3.54% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and ISHG is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2010 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. ISHG — Risk / Return Rank
URA
ISHG
URA vs. ISHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URA | ISHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.03 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 0.20 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | 0.49 | +1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URA vs. ISHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than ISHG's maximum drawdown of -37.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and ISHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | ISHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -37.24% | -56.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.48% | -5.02% | -26.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | -8.21% | -29.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | -22.91% | -14.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | -25.56% | -35.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.34% | -22.37% | -25.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -18.44% | -56.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | 2.05% | +12.07% |
Volatility
URA vs. ISHG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) at 1.67%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | ISHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.69% | 1.67% | +16.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.95% | 4.76% | +35.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 6.51% | +44.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.96% | 7.58% | +36.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 6.94% | +30.97% |
URA vs. ISHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than ISHG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
URA vs. ISHG - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than ISHG's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHG iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF | 1.45% | 1.45% | 2.56% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 1.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.80% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and ISHG have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to ISHG (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs ISHG's -37.24%.
On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.90% vs -0.14% for ISHG. On fees, ISHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ISHG has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.90% return vs -0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.45% for ISHG.
URA is categorized as Uranium, while ISHG is International Government Bonds. URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while ISHG tracks S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US 1-3 Year. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.35% for ISHG.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and ISHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer