URA vs. IBID
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, URA returned 11.15% vs 3.54% for IBID. Their -0.03 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
URA vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 2.35% return.
URA
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- 6M
- -18.13%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- 30.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
- ALL TIME*
- -2.78%
IBID
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 3.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.34%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $833.66K | $776.63K | $746.99K | |
| $146.89M | $130.14M | $166.89M |
URA vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 0.37% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 11.03% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 2.35% | 5.66% | 4.71% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and IBID is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.03 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between URA and IBID has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.03 to -0.24, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
URA
IBID
URA vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URA | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.66 | -0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 6.46 | -6.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 22.66 | -22.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URA vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -1.28% | -92.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.30% | -0.55% | -38.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.33% | -0.14% | -51.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.73% | -0.22% | -74.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.44% | 0.16% | +18.28% |
Volatility
URA vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 14.05% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.05% | 0.32% | +13.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.64% | 0.92% | +36.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.36% | 1.15% | +51.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.18% | 2.21% | +41.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.15% | 2.21% | +35.94% |
URA vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
URA vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, which matches IBID's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 4.90% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.86% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and IBID have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (14.05%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, URA leads with 11.15% vs 3.54% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, URA has performed better with a 11.15% return vs 3.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
IBID has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 4.86% for URA.
URA is categorized as Uranium, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer