PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
URA vs. CRAK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

URA vs. CRAK

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and CRAK (VanEck Oil Refiners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URA is a Uranium fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while CRAK is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, URA returned 15.90%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for CRAK. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for CRAK.

Performance

URA vs. CRAK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than CRAK's 29.26% return. Over the past 10 years, URA has outperformed CRAK with an annualized return of 15.90%, while CRAK has yielded a comparatively lower 13.50% annualized return.

URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-13.30%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.00%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%

CRAK

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.07%
YTD
29.26%
6M
26.17%
1Y
55.23%
3Y*
20.46%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
13.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. CRAK - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		6.53%67.18%-0.58%46.25%-11.32%57.57%41.33%-3.54%-22.11%19.36%
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		29.26%39.11%-15.05%13.73%19.10%10.90%-11.22%9.15%-10.46%49.86%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and CRAK is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between URA and CRAK has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

URA vs. CRAK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
URA
CRAK

Energy

64.2%
98.8%

Industrials

22.7%
4.0%

Utilities

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.2%

Technology

0.9%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Energy

URA
64.2%
CRAK
98.8%

Industrials

URA
22.7%
CRAK
4.0%

Utilities

URA
7.4%
CRAK

-

Basic Materials

URA
4.8%
CRAK
1.2%

Technology

URA
0.9%
CRAK

-

Communication Services

URA

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Cyclical

URA

-

CRAK

-

Consumer Defensive

URA

-

CRAK

-

Financial Services

URA

-

CRAK

-

Healthcare

URA

-

CRAK

-

Real Estate

URA

-

CRAK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Uranium ETF

VanEck Oil Refiners ETF

Often compared with URA:
URA vs. NLRURA vs. URNMURA vs. NUKZURA vs. CCJURA vs. UUUUURA vs. URANURA vs. SPY
Often compared with CRAK:
CRAK vs. XLECRAK vs. OIHCRAK vs. VDECRAK vs. IEOCRAK vs. USAICRAK vs. EINCCRAK vs. AMLP

Return for Risk

URA vs. CRAK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
CRAK
CRAK Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CRAK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRAK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRAK Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CRAK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRAK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. CRAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

URACRAKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.64
2.98

-2.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.21
3.91

-2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.50

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

6.49

-5.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

17.24

-14.94

URA vs. CRAK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the CRAK Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and CRAK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URA vs. CRAK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than CRAK's maximum drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and CRAK.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

URACRAKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-58.80%

-34.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.48%

-8.57%

-22.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

-35.61%

-2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

-35.61%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

-58.80%

-2.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.34%

-6.68%

-41.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-12.48%

-62.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

3.22%

+10.90%

Volatility

URA vs. CRAK - Volatility Comparison

Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to VanEck Oil Refiners ETF (CRAK) at 5.81%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRAK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

URACRAKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

5.81%

+11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.95%

14.72%

+25.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

18.66%

+32.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.96%

20.67%

+23.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.91%

22.17%

+15.74%

URA vs. CRAK - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CRAK's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

URA vs. CRAK - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than CRAK's 1.56% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRAK
VanEck Oil Refiners ETF		1.56%2.02%5.60%3.65%3.08%2.40%2.64%1.49%2.42%1.66%3.42%0.47%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF		4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

URA and CRAK have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to CRAK (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs CRAK's -58.80%.

On 10-year performance, URA leads with 15.90% vs 13.50% for CRAK. On fees, CRAK is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, CRAK has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, URA has performed better with a 15.90% return vs 13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CRAK is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.56% for CRAK.

URA is categorized as Uranium, while CRAK is Energy Equities. URA tracks Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while CRAK tracks MVIS Global Oil Refiners Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.62% for CRAK.

CRAK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and CRAK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer