URA vs. AVUV
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) and AVUV (Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - URA is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while AVUV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. URA is passively managed, while AVUV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, URA returned 18.04%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for AVUV. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. URA charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AVUV.
Performance
URA vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 19.43% return.
URA
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -20.04%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- -3.95%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 32.02%
- 5Y*
- 18.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
AVUV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 6M
- 18.83%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.65%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
URA vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 3.25% | 67.18% | -0.58% | 46.25% | -11.32% | 57.57% | 41.33% | 0.18% |
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 19.43% | 7.44% | 9.28% | 22.82% | -4.91% | 42.20% | 6.43% | 8.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and AVUV is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.49 |
The correlation between URA and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
URA vs. AVUV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
URA
AVUV
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
URA
AVUV
Industrials
URA
AVUV
Utilities
URA
AVUV
Basic Materials
URA
AVUV
Technology
URA
AVUV
Communication Services
URA
-
AVUV
Consumer Cyclical
URA
-
AVUV
Consumer Defensive
URA
-
AVUV
Financial Services
URA
-
AVUV
Healthcare
URA
-
AVUV
Real Estate
URA
-
AVUV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank
URA
AVUV
URA vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| URA | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 4.61 | -3.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.29 | 13.68 | -11.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| URA | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.09 | -1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.50 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | 0.56 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
URA vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than AVUV's maximum drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and AVUV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -49.42% | -44.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.62% | -7.95% | -20.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | -28.79% | -9.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | -28.79% | -9.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.93% | 0.00% | -49.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.96% | -7.93% | -67.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.77% | 2.67% | +11.10% |
Volatility
URA vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) at 4.29%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | AVUV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.09% | 4.29% | +12.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.31% | 11.40% | +27.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.30% | 17.54% | +33.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.86% | 22.75% | +21.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.86% | 28.27% | +9.59% |
URA vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison
URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
URA vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than AVUV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVUV Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 1.21% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.72% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and AVUV have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to AVUV (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs AVUV's -49.42%.
On 5-year performance, URA leads with 18.04% vs 11.22% for AVUV. On fees, AVUV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVUV has been the lower-risk option at 4.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, URA has performed better with a 18.04% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVUV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for URA.
URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.65% for AVUV.
URA is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 0.25% for AVUV.
AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and AVUV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer