PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
URA vs. AVGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

URA vs. AVGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than AVGX's 3.39% return.


URA

1D
1.54%
1M
-14.61%
YTD
6.53%
6M
3.57%
1Y
32.44%
3Y*
32.17%
5Y*
18.77%
10Y*
15.90%

AVGX

1D
-1.88%
1M
-20.84%
YTD
3.39%
6M
-5.26%
1Y
58.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

URA vs. AVGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
6.53%67.18%6.90%
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
3.39%46.98%54.13%

Correlation

The correlation between URA and AVGX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2024

0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

URA vs. AVGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

URA
URA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGX
AVGX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
AVGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

URA vs. AVGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


URAAVGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

1.08

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.30

2.35

-0.05

URA vs. AVGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current URA Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the AVGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of URA and AVGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

URA vs. AVGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than AVGX's maximum drawdown of -70.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and AVGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


URAAVGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.54%

-70.97%

-22.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.48%

-54.09%

+22.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.34%

-39.65%

-8.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-23.11%

-51.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

24.90%

-10.78%

Volatility

URA vs. AVGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) is 17.69%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF (AVGX) has a volatility of 42.68%. This indicates that URA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


URAAVGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

42.68%

-24.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.95%

71.57%

-31.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.24%

91.19%

-39.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.96%

106.96%

-63.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.91%

106.96%

-69.05%

URA vs. AVGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

URA has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than AVGX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

URA vs. AVGX - Dividend Comparison

URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than AVGX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
1.60%1.65%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
URA
Global X Uranium ETF
4.58%4.88%2.86%6.07%0.76%5.84%1.69%1.66%0.44%2.03%7.28%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


URA and AVGX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGX has higher volatility (42.68%) compared to URA (17.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs AVGX's -70.97%.

On 1-year performance, AVGX leads with 58.36% vs 32.44% for URA. On fees, URA is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, URA has been the lower-risk option at 17.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGX has performed better with a 58.36% return vs 32.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

URA is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for AVGX.

URA has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 1.60% for AVGX.

URA is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while AVGX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for URA and 1.29% for AVGX.

AVGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for URA and AVGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer