URA vs. AS
URA (Global X Uranium ETF) is Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Total Return Index, while AS (Amer Sports, Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, URA returned 32.44% vs -5.21% for AS. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
URA vs. AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly higher than AS's -5.06% return.
URA
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -14.61%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 32.44%
- 3Y*
- 32.17%
- 5Y*
- 18.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
AS
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- -5.06%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- -5.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URA vs. AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 6.53% | 67.18% | -9.20% |
AS Amer Sports, Inc | -5.06% | 33.58% | 108.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between URA and AS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2024 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
URA vs. AS — Risk / Return Rank
URA
AS
URA vs. AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Uranium ETF (URA) and Amer Sports, Inc (AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| URA | AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.01 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.18 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.30 | -0.36 | +2.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
URA vs. AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URA drawdown since its inception was -93.54%, which is greater than AS's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URA and AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| URA | AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.54% | -40.71% | -52.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.48% | -28.78% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.34% | -15.49% | -32.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -13.29% | -61.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | 14.56% | -0.44% |
Volatility
URA vs. AS - Volatility Comparison
Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a higher volatility of 17.69% compared to Amer Sports, Inc (AS) at 10.17%. This indicates that URA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| URA | AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.69% | 10.17% | +7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.95% | 29.10% | +10.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.24% | 41.31% | +9.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.96% | 49.55% | -5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.91% | 49.55% | -11.64% |
Dividends
URA vs. AS - Dividend Comparison
URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, while AS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS Amer Sports, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URA Global X Uranium ETF | 4.58% | 4.88% | 2.86% | 6.07% | 0.76% | 5.84% | 1.69% | 1.66% | 0.44% | 2.03% | 7.28% | 1.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
URA and AS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
URA has higher volatility (17.69%) compared to AS (10.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, URA dropped -93.54% vs AS's -40.71%.
URA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for URA and AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer