PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (VRPS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UQLT.L is traded in GBp, while VRPS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VRPS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UQLT.L achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly higher than VRPS.L's 2.32% return.


UQLT.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.58%
6M
8.77%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
23.33%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
14.42%

VRPS.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-1.08%
6M
0.95%
YTD
2.32%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
7.33%
5Y*
3.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UQLT.L
UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
10.15%17.64%20.58%33.76%-25.29%27.69%19.02%34.52%-14.60%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.32%-1.25%12.75%3.81%1.00%4.61%1.13%13.26%-4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between UQLT.L and VRPS.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UQLT.L
UQLT.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UQLT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
UQLT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VRPS.L
VRPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) and Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (VRPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UQLT.LVRPS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.13

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

1.06

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.36

2.89

+5.46

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UQLT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the VRPS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UQLT.L and VRPS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UQLT.L drawdown since its inception was -33.41%, which is greater than VRPS.L's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UQLT.L and VRPS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UQLT.LVRPS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.41%

-27.14%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.63%

-4.75%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.34%

-9.37%

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.53%

-15.84%

-15.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-2.17%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.41%

-4.63%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.74%

+1.04%

Volatility

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (UQLT.L) has a higher volatility of 3.81% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (VRPS.L) at 1.77%. This indicates that UQLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRPS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UQLT.LVRPS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.81%

1.77%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.96%

5.23%

+5.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

6.86%

+7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.85%

8.74%

+9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

12.29%

+5.20%

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UQLT.L has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than VRPS.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UQLT.L vs. VRPS.L - Dividend Comparison

UQLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than VRPS.L's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
UQLT.L
UBS Factor MSCI USA Quality Screened UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.22%0.54%0.30%0.78%0.81%0.70%0.86%0.93%1.24%1.04%0.65%
VRPS.L
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.14%4.99%4.98%4.97%4.60%3.72%3.97%4.33%0.70%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UQLT.L and VRPS.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UQLT.L is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UQLT.L is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRPS.L.

UQLT.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VRPS.L is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. UQLT.L tracks MSCI USA Quality Advanced Target Select 100% Hedged to GBP Index, while VRPS.L tracks ICE Diversified Variable Rate Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for UQLT.L and 0.50% for VRPS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UQLT.L and VRPS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer