VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L
VRPS.L (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VRPS.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VRPS.L returned 3.52%/yr vs -54.86%/yr for SPXP.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRPS.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VRPS.L is traded in USD, while SPXP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SPXP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRPS.L achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPXP.L's 10.74% return.
VRPS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 1Y
- -98.78%
- 3Y*
- -74.05%
- 5Y*
- -54.86%
- 10Y*
- -27.31%
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRPS.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF | 2.20% | 6.33% | 10.82% | 9.27% | -9.73% | 3.63% | 4.19% | 17.74% | -6.03% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.74% | -98.82% | 25.46% | 26.40% | -18.54% | 30.07% | 17.39% | 31.85% | -14.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRPS.L and SPXP.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2018 | 0.50 |
The correlation between VRPS.L and SPXP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
VRPS.L
SPXP.L
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRPS.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.51 | +0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | -1.00 | +3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | -1.23 | +10.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRPS.L drawdown since its inception was -34.22%, smaller than the maximum SPXP.L drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRPS.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRPS.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.22% | -99.07% | +64.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.11% | -99.07% | +96.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.45% | -99.07% | +95.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.90% | -99.07% | +85.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -98.89% | +98.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -9.40% | +6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 80.33% | -79.76% |
Volatility
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF (VRPS.L) is 0.68%, while Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that VRPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRPS.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 3.19% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.82% | 8.72% | -5.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.88% | 99.37% | -95.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 46.98% | -41.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 35.20% | -24.36% |
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRPS.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRPS.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
VRPS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, while SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRPS.L Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF | 5.14% | 4.99% | 4.98% | 4.97% | 4.60% | 3.72% | 3.97% | 4.33% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRPS.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRPS.L.
VRPS.L is categorized as Global Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. VRPS.L tracks Invesco Variable Rate Preferred Shares UCITS ETF, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VRPS.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for VRPS.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer