UPW vs. UYM
UPW (ProShares Ultra Utilities) and UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - UPW tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Index (200%) while UYM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UPW returned 9.80%/yr vs 11.91%/yr for UYM. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UPW vs. UYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPW achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than UYM's 25.72% return. Over the past 10 years, UPW has underperformed UYM with an annualized return of 9.80%, while UYM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.91% annualized return.
UPW
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- -11.72%
- YTD
- 2.44%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- 1Y
- 9.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
UYM
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 25.72%
- 6M
- 31.43%
- 1Y
- 32.36%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.91%
UPW vs. UYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPW ProShares Ultra Utilities | 2.44% | 23.61% | 37.67% | -22.37% | -4.59% | 32.57% | -17.15% | 48.59% | 2.36% | 22.53% |
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 25.72% | 9.46% | -8.00% | 17.47% | -23.10% | 54.58% | 16.56% | 35.09% | -35.68% | 51.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPW and UYM is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007 | 0.41 |
UPW vs. UYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPW
UYM
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
UPW
UYM
-
Basic Materials
UPW
-
UYM
Communication Services
UPW
-
UYM
-
Consumer Cyclical
UPW
-
UYM
Consumer Defensive
UPW
-
UYM
-
Energy
UPW
-
UYM
-
Financial Services
UPW
-
UYM
-
Healthcare
UPW
-
UYM
-
Industrials
UPW
-
UYM
Real Estate
UPW
-
UYM
-
Technology
UPW
-
UYM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPW vs. UYM — Risk / Return Rank
UPW
UYM
UPW vs. UYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPW | UYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.18 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 1.36 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 3.71 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPW | UYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.97 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.09 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.28 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.09 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
UPW vs. UYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPW drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, smaller than the maximum UYM drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPW and UYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPW | UYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.75% | -92.77% | +15.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.15% | -23.85% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.16% | -43.88% | +10.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.42% | -48.25% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.67% | -73.31% | +10.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.92% | -8.94% | -7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.59% | -42.11% | +19.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.80% | 8.73% | +0.07% |
Volatility
UPW vs. UYM - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) have volatilities of 11.15% and 11.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPW | UYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.15% | 11.55% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.31% | 25.84% | -2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.05% | 33.71% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 39.26% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.17% | 42.76% | -5.59% |
UPW vs. UYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UPW and UYM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UPW vs. UYM - Dividend Comparison
UPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than UYM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPW ProShares Ultra Utilities | 1.56% | 1.67% | 1.83% | 2.40% | 1.55% | 1.30% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 1.98% | 1.51% | 1.70% | 2.16% |
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials | 1.21% | 1.47% | 0.98% | 0.28% | 0.88% | 0.52% | 0.56% | 1.24% | 0.94% | 0.38% | 0.55% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPW and UYM have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UYM has higher volatility (11.55%) compared to UPW (11.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPW dropped -77.75% vs UYM's -92.77%.
On 10-year performance, UYM leads with 11.91% vs 9.80% for UPW. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UPW has been the lower-risk option at 11.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UYM has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 9.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPW and UYM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
UPW has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.21% for UYM.
UPW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Index (200%), while UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%).
UYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPW and UYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer