PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPW vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPW vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPW achieves a 12.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 26.03% return. Over the past 10 years, UPW has underperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 10.00%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively higher 20.66% annualized return.


UPW

1D
1.51%
1M
6.52%
6M
13.90%
YTD
12.70%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
19.06%
5Y*
11.78%
10Y*
10.00%

SPMO

1D
-2.61%
1M
-1.65%
6M
24.83%
YTD
26.03%
1Y
34.61%
3Y*
40.56%
5Y*
21.26%
10Y*
20.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPW vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
12.70%23.61%37.67%-22.37%-4.59%32.57%-17.15%48.59%2.36%22.53%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
26.03%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-0.92%27.76%

Correlation

The correlation between UPW and SPMO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015

0.28

Over the past year, the correlation between UPW and SPMO has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UPW vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UPW
SPMO

Utilities

100.0%
2.7%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

2.8%

Financial Services

-

5.7%

Healthcare

-

6.6%

Industrials

-

10.9%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

55.0%

Utilities

UPW
100.0%
SPMO
2.7%

Basic Materials

UPW

-

SPMO
1.8%

Communication Services

UPW

-

SPMO
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

UPW

-

SPMO
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

UPW

-

SPMO
3.9%

Energy

UPW

-

SPMO
2.8%

Financial Services

UPW

-

SPMO
5.7%

Healthcare

UPW

-

SPMO
6.6%

Industrials

UPW

-

SPMO
10.9%

Real Estate

UPW

-

SPMO
1.0%

Technology

UPW

-

SPMO
55.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPW vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPW
UPW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
UPW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
UPW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPW Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPW vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPWSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

2.74

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.10

9.73

-7.63

UPW vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPW Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPW and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPW vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPW drawdown since its inception was -77.75%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPW and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPWSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.75%

-30.95%

-46.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.15%

-12.70%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.16%

-20.13%

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.42%

-22.74%

-26.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.67%

-30.95%

-31.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.60%

-7.38%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.53%

-4.59%

-17.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.58%

3.56%

+6.02%

Volatility

UPW vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Utilities (UPW) is 9.03%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that UPW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPWSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

12.53%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

19.77%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.92%

22.23%

+7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.50%

20.25%

+14.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.26%

20.80%

+16.46%

UPW vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPW has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPW vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

UPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, more than SPMO's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.70%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
UPW
ProShares Ultra Utilities
1.38%1.67%1.83%2.40%1.55%1.30%0.83%0.83%1.98%1.51%1.70%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPW and SPMO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (12.53%) compared to UPW (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPW dropped -77.75% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 10-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.66% vs 10.00% for UPW. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, UPW has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.66% return vs 10.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UPW.

UPW has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.70% for SPMO.

UPW is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. UPW tracks Dow Jones U.S. Utilities Index (200%), while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPW and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPW and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer