UPV vs. MVLL
UPV (ProShares Ultra Europe) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - UPV tracks the MSCI Europe Index (200%) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UPV returned 28.43% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPV charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.
Performance
UPV vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPV achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.
UPV
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 28.43%
- 3Y*
- 23.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
MVLL
- 1D
- 7.14%
- 1M
- 201.84%
- YTD
- 842.68%
- 6M
- 558.01%
- 1Y
- 1,215.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPV vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 7.15% | 28.11% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 842.68% | -10.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPV and MVLL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025 | 0.36 |
UPV vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UPV
MVLL
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
UPV
MVLL
-
Basic Materials
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Communication Services
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Defensive
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Energy
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Healthcare
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Industrials
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Real Estate
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Technology
UPV
-
MVLL
Utilities
UPV
-
MVLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPV vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
UPV
MVLL
UPV vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPV | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.63 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 25.11 | -23.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 52.27 | -48.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPV | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 9.23 | -8.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 3.33 | -3.08 |
Drawdowns
UPV vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPV drawdown since its inception was -67.25%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPV and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPV | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.25% | -59.02% | -8.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.41% | -48.93% | +25.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.33% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | 0.00% | -7.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.83% | -22.42% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 23.46% | -16.61% |
Volatility
UPV vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Europe (UPV) is 11.54%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that UPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPV | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.54% | 60.78% | -49.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.61% | 96.08% | -70.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.74% | 133.11% | -102.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.38% | 139.63% | -104.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.14% | 139.63% | -102.49% |
UPV vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPV vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
UPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while MVLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPV ProShares Ultra Europe | 2.14% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 3.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPV and MVLL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to UPV (11.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPV dropped -67.25% vs MVLL's -59.02%.
On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs 28.43% for UPV. On fees, UPV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, UPV has been the lower-risk option at 11.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs 28.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.
UPV has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for MVLL.
UPV tracks MSCI Europe Index (200%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UPV and 1.50% for MVLL.
MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UPV and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer