PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPSG vs. LINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPSG vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long UPS Daily ETF (UPSG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPSG achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 562.84% return.


UPSG

1D
-0.13%
1M
30.08%
YTD
16.33%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LINT

1D
9.00%
1M
30.35%
YTD
562.84%
6M
362.73%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPSG vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UPSG
Leverage Shares 2X Long UPS Daily ETF
16.33%-2.59%
LINT
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares
562.84%-13.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UPSG and LINT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPSG vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long UPS Daily ETF (UPSG) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UPSG vs. LINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UPSGLINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

24.05

-23.52

Drawdowns

UPSG vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPSG drawdown since its inception was -37.29%, smaller than the maximum LINT drawdown of -49.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPSG and LINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPSGLINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.29%

-49.54%

+12.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.43%

-26.55%

+8.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.93%

-20.51%

+3.58%

Volatility

UPSG vs. LINT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPSGLINTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.91%

163.04%

-104.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.91%

163.04%

-104.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.91%

163.04%

-104.13%

UPSG vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPSG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPSG vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

UPSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UPSG and LINT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UPSG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UPSG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for LINT.

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for UPSG.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UPSG and 0.97% for LINT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPSG and LINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer