PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPS vs. MDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UPS vs. MDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Medtronic plc (MDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPS achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly higher than MDT's -15.83% return. Over the past 10 years, UPS has outperformed MDT with an annualized return of 4.31%, while MDT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.


UPS

1D
-0.51%
1M
11.11%
YTD
12.37%
6M
10.44%
1Y
15.53%
3Y*
-9.66%
5Y*
-7.78%
10Y*
4.31%

MDT

1D
-0.16%
1M
5.32%
YTD
-15.83%
6M
-18.44%
1Y
-5.18%
3Y*
1.02%
5Y*
-5.47%
10Y*
2.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPS vs. MDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
12.37%-15.93%-15.93%-5.96%-16.21%30.02%48.64%24.24%-15.48%7.14%
MDT
Medtronic plc
-15.83%24.05%0.28%9.58%-22.55%-9.79%5.70%27.34%15.18%15.90%

Correlation

The correlation between UPS and MDT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 1999

0.36

The correlation between UPS and MDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UPS:

$91.89B

MDT:

$103.31B

EPS

UPS:

$6.18

MDT:

$3.58

PE Ratio

UPS:

17.49

MDT:

22.38

PS Ratio

UPS:

1.04

MDT:

2.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

UPS:

$88.34B

MDT:

$35.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UPS:

$16.03B

MDT:

$5.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

UPS:

$10.63B

MDT:

$7.11B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPS vs. MDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPS
UPS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
UPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MDT
MDT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
MDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDT Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPS vs. MDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Medtronic plc (MDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPSMDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.96

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

-0.23

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.22

-0.56

+1.78

UPS vs. MDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPS Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the MDT Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPS and MDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPS vs. MDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPS drawdown since its inception was -57.92%, roughly equal to the maximum MDT drawdown of -57.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPS and MDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPSMDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.92%

-57.63%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.28%

-28.90%

+8.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.71%

-28.90%

-21.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.92%

-45.10%

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.92%

-45.10%

-12.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.22%

-31.23%

-10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.33%

-16.55%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.93%

11.52%

+0.41%

Volatility

UPS vs. MDT - Volatility Comparison

United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) and Medtronic plc (MDT) have volatilities of 9.06% and 9.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPSMDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.06%

9.32%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.69%

16.28%

+5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.72%

21.07%

+8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.46%

21.93%

+6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.61%

23.25%

+4.36%

Dividends

UPS vs. MDT - Dividend Comparison

UPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.07%, more than MDT's 3.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDT
Medtronic plc
3.54%2.95%3.49%3.34%3.44%2.39%1.95%1.87%2.15%2.24%2.34%1.88%
UPS
United Parcel Service, Inc.
6.07%6.61%5.17%4.12%3.50%1.90%2.40%3.28%3.73%2.79%2.72%3.03%

Financials

UPS vs. MDT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Parcel Service, Inc. and Medtronic plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
21.20B
9.02B
(UPS) Total Revenue
(MDT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UPS and MDT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDT has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to UPS (9.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPS dropped -57.92% vs MDT's -57.63%.

UPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPS and MDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer