UPRO vs. NVDG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) and NVDG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UPRO is passively managed, while NVDG is actively managed. Over the past year, UPRO returned 80.84% vs 83.14% for NVDG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UPRO charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NVDG.

Performance

UPRO vs. NVDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPRO achieves a 27.90% return, which is significantly higher than NVDG's 18.93% return.

UPRO

• 1D: -2.09%
• 1M: 14.64%
• YTD: 27.90%
• 6M: 26.67%
• 1Y: 80.84%
• 3Y*: 52.58%
• 5Y*: 23.13%
• 10Y*: 30.09%

NVDG

• 1D: -7.35%
• 1M: 14.07%
• YTD: 18.93%
• 6M: 26.05%
• 1Y: 83.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPRO vs. NVDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	27.90%	31.88%	-8.80%
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF	18.93%	32.45%	-0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between UPRO and NVDG is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024	0.65

The correlation between UPRO and NVDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UPRO vs. NVDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPRO

UPRO Risk / Return Rank: 62
UPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
UPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
UPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
UPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
UPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 68

NVDG

NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 34
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPRO vs. NVDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UPRO	NVDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.24	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	1.87	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.22	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	1.96	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	4.44	+8.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UPRO vs. NVDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the NVDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPRO and NVDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UPRO	NVDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	1.24	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.40	+0.25

Drawdowns

UPRO vs. NVDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPRO drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, which is greater than NVDG's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPRO and NVDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPRO	NVDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.82%	-66.19%	-10.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.78%	-42.72%	+15.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-18.34%	+16.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.42%	-23.07%	+8.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.33%	18.77%	-12.44%

Volatility

UPRO vs. NVDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) is 8.45%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a volatility of 25.14%. This indicates that UPRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UPRO	NVDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	25.14%	-16.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.60%	50.15%	-23.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.35%	67.81%	-32.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.32%	90.72%	-40.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.74%	90.72%	-36.98%

UPRO vs. NVDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPRO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

UPRO vs. NVDG - Dividend Comparison

UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than NVDG's 9.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVDG Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF	9.93%	11.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500	0.68%	0.84%	0.93%	0.74%	0.52%	0.06%	0.11%	0.41%	0.63%	0.00%	0.12%	0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UPRO and NVDG in my portfolio?

UPRO and NVDG have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UPRO or NVDG?

NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to UPRO (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPRO dropped -76.82% vs NVDG's -66.19%.

Which ETF is better, UPRO or NVDG?

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs 80.84% for UPRO. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 8.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UPRO or NVDG?

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs 80.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UPRO or NVDG?

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UPRO or NVDG?

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 0.68% for UPRO.

What is the main difference between UPRO and NVDG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for UPRO and 0.75% for NVDG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.