UPRO vs. NEMG
UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) and NEMG (Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UPRO is passively managed, while NEMG is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPRO charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NEMG.
Performance
UPRO vs. NEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPRO achieves a 17.21% return, which is significantly higher than NEMG's -20.44% return.
UPRO
- 1D
- -4.27%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 62.29%
- 3Y*
- 46.23%
- 5Y*
- 20.37%
- 10Y*
- 30.18%
NEMG
- 1D
- -7.98%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -20.44%
- 6M
- -28.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPRO vs. NEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 17.21% | 3.58% |
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | -20.44% | 22.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPRO and NEMG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPRO vs. NEMG — Risk / Return Rank
UPRO
NEMG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPRO vs. NEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF (NEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPRO | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPRO vs. NEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPRO drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, which is greater than NEMG's maximum drawdown of -57.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPRO and NEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPRO | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.82% | -57.56% | -19.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.27% | -53.44% | +43.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.39% | -23.21% | +8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | — | — |
Volatility
UPRO vs. NEMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPRO | NEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.35% | 102.63% | -65.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.62% | 102.63% | -52.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.79% | 102.63% | -48.84% |
UPRO vs. NEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPRO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NEMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPRO vs. NEMG - Dividend Comparison
UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while NEMG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NEMG Leverage Shares 2x Long NEM Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.74% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPRO and NEMG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for NEMG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for UPRO and 0.75% for NEMG.
Find the right allocation for UPRO and NEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer