UPRO vs. NBIG
UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) and NBIG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. UPRO is passively managed, while NBIG is actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPRO charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NBIG.
Performance
UPRO vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPRO achieves a 24.61% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 113.05% return.
UPRO
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 19.67%
- YTD
- 24.61%
- 1Y
- 54.64%
- 3Y*
- 43.89%
- 5Y*
- 20.84%
- 10Y*
- 28.60%
NBIG
- 1D
- -27.68%
- 1M
- -63.63%
- 6M
- 42.32%
- YTD
- 113.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPRO vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 24.61% | 0.29% |
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 113.05% | -59.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPRO and NBIG is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPRO vs. NBIG — Risk / Return Rank
UPRO
NBIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPRO vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPRO | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPRO vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPRO drawdown since its inception was -76.82%, roughly equal to the maximum NBIG drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPRO and NBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPRO | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.82% | -75.83% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -68.58% | +63.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -40.79% | +26.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.78% | — | — |
Volatility
UPRO vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPRO | NBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.59% | 204.75% | -167.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.67% | 204.75% | -154.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.71% | 204.75% | -151.04% |
UPRO vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPRO has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPRO vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison
UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NBIG Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.75% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPRO and NBIG have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for UPRO and 0.75% for NBIG.
Find the right allocation for UPRO and NBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer