UPGR vs. USNG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG).

UPGR and USNG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UPGR is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Jul 12, 2023. USNG is an actively managed fund by Amplify. It was launched on May 19, 2025.

Performance

UPGR vs. USNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UPGR vs. USNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	-1.84%	34.75%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	19.70%	10.81%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than USNG's 19.70% return.

UPGR

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -5.50%
• YTD: -1.84%
• 6M: -2.02%
• 1Y: 54.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

USNG

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: -1.05%
• YTD: 19.70%
• 6M: 17.55%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UPGR vs. USNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than USNG's 0.59% expense ratio.

USNG

Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF

UPGR

Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF

Return for Risk

UPGR vs. USNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UPGR

UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 81
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UPGR vs. USNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF (USNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UPGR	USNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.66	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UPGR	USNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	2.41	-2.46

Correlation

The correlation between UPGR and USNG is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UPGR vs. USNG - Dividend Comparison

UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than USNG's 1.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF	0.34%	0.39%	1.16%	0.32%
USNG Amplify Samsung U.S. Natural Gas Infrastructure ETF	1.24%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

UPGR vs. USNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than USNG's maximum drawdown of -6.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and USNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	UPGR	USNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.60%	-6.82%	-39.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.90%	-4.02%	-8.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.52%	-1.38%	-20.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	UPGR	USNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.85%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.40%	16.17%	+16.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.47%	16.17%	+14.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.47%	16.17%	+14.30%