PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPGR vs. SNPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPGR vs. SNPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly lower than SNPD's 15.68% return.


UPGR

1D
2.39%
1M
-7.60%
6M
-6.42%
YTD
2.89%
1Y
31.84%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.18%

SNPD

1D
0.56%
1M
1.41%
6M
7.94%
YTD
15.68%
1Y
20.68%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.15K$33.91K$29.19K
$5.80K$13.09K$34.38K

UPGR vs. SNPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UPGR
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF
2.89%35.25%-14.72%-15.29%
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
15.68%6.66%5.41%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between UPGR and SNPD is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between UPGR and SNPD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

UPGR vs. SNPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UPGR
SNPD

Industrials

54.6%
17.7%

Basic Materials

11.8%
6.8%

Technology

10.9%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.3%

Utilities

8.7%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
19.0%

Energy

1.6%
2.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
8.3%

Communication Services

-

3.0%

Healthcare

-

5.2%

Real Estate

-

6.8%

Industrials

UPGR
54.6%
SNPD
17.7%

Basic Materials

UPGR
11.8%
SNPD
6.8%

Technology

UPGR
10.9%
SNPD
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UPGR
9.3%
SNPD
9.3%

Utilities

UPGR
8.7%
SNPD
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

UPGR
2.8%
SNPD
19.0%

Energy

UPGR
1.6%
SNPD
2.9%

Financial Services

UPGR
0.2%
SNPD
8.3%

Communication Services

UPGR

-

SNPD
3.0%

Healthcare

UPGR

-

SNPD
5.2%

Real Estate

UPGR

-

SNPD
6.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPGR vs. SNPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UPGR
UPGR Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
UPGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPGR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
UPGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPGR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SNPD
SNPD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SNPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNPD Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SNPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNPD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UPGR vs. SNPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPGRSNPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.31

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

2.39

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

7.14

-3.42

UPGR vs. SNPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPGR Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the SNPD Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPGR and SNPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPGR vs. SNPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than SNPD's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and SNPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPGRSNPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.60%

-15.80%

-30.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.71%

-8.68%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.58%

-15.80%

-26.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.86%

-2.11%

-15.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-3.81%

-16.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.58%

2.90%

+5.68%

Volatility

UPGR vs. SNPD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) has a higher volatility of 10.96% compared to Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF (SNPD) at 4.36%. This indicates that UPGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPGRSNPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.96%

4.36%

+6.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.21%

8.84%

+15.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.99%

11.50%

+21.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.09%

13.15%

+17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.09%

13.15%

+17.94%

UPGR vs. SNPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SNPD's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPGR vs. SNPD - Dividend Comparison

UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than SNPD's 3.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
SNPD
Xtrackers S&P ESG Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.14%3.10%2.78%2.63%0.57%
UPGR
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF
0.31%0.39%1.16%0.32%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPGR and SNPD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UPGR has higher volatility (10.96%) compared to SNPD (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPGR dropped -46.60% vs SNPD's -15.80%.

On 3-year performance, SNPD leads with 9.43% vs 2.07% for UPGR. On fees, SNPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SNPD has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SNPD has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 2.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SNPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UPGR.

SNPD has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 0.31% for UPGR.

UPGR is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while SNPD is Mid Cap Value Equities. UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SNPD tracks S&P ESG High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.15% for SNPD.

SNPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPGR and SNPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer