UPGR vs. GXPE
UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. UPGR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
UPGR vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 28.22% return.
UPGR
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- 6M
- -2.10%
- YTD
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 31.11%
- 3Y*
- 1.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- 6M
- 22.19%
- YTD
- 28.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPGR vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 6.19% | 16.43% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 28.22% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPGR and GXPE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPGR vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
UPGR
GXPE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UPGR vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UPGR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UPGR vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPGR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.60% | -15.73% | -30.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.23% | -8.98% | -6.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.15% | -4.17% | -15.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | — | — |
Volatility
UPGR vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPGR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.43% | 20.81% | +11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 20.81% | +10.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 20.81% | +10.18% |
UPGR vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPGR vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than GXPE's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 2.17% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.30% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPGR and GXPE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UPGR.
GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.30% for UPGR.
UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for UPGR and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer