UPGR vs. GXPE
UPGR (Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - UPGR tracks the Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UPGR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
UPGR vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UPGR achieves a 22.11% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 31.18% return.
UPGR
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 22.11%
- 6M
- 20.09%
- 1Y
- 71.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GXPE
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 31.18%
- 6M
- 29.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPGR vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 22.11% | 16.05% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 31.18% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between UPGR and GXPE is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UPGR vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
UPGR
GXPE
UPGR vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF (UPGR) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UPGR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.37 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UPGR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 2.18 | -1.97 |
Drawdowns
UPGR vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UPGR drawdown since its inception was -46.60%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPGR and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UPGR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.60% | -12.37% | -34.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | -6.88% | +4.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.53% | -3.21% | -17.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.73% | — | — |
Volatility
UPGR vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UPGR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.37% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.33% | 20.42% | +9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.51% | 20.42% | +10.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.51% | 20.42% | +10.09% |
UPGR vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
UPGR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
UPGR vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
UPGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than GXPE's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.92% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UPGR Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF | 0.27% | 0.39% | 1.16% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UPGR and GXPE have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UPGR.
GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.27% for UPGR.
UPGR tracks Solactive United States Green Infrastructure ESG Screened Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for UPGR and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for UPGR and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer