PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UPAR vs. GRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UPAR vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UPAR achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than GRNY's 9.17% return.


UPAR

1D
-0.88%
1M
-2.83%
6M
-2.26%
YTD
3.37%
1Y
15.74%
3Y*
8.22%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-1.97%

GRNY

1D
0.75%
1M
-2.03%
6M
7.01%
YTD
9.17%
1Y
17.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.81M$33.73M$44.12M
$78.06K$57.40K$209.69K

UPAR vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
3.37%23.87%-5.25%
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF
9.17%24.05%-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UPAR and GRNY is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024

0.51

The correlation between UPAR and GRNY shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.61 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UPAR vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UPAR
UPAR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
UPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNY
GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UPAR vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPARGRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

1.31

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

3.88

-0.27

UPAR vs. GRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UPAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the GRNY Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UPAR and GRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UPAR vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UPAR drawdown since its inception was -39.54%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UPAR and GRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPARGRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.54%

-24.18%

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

-11.63%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.76%

-3.40%

-6.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.91%

-3.83%

-18.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

3.91%

+0.60%

Volatility

UPAR vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF (UPAR) is 3.57%, while Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that UPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPARGRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

4.42%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

13.15%

-0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.31%

18.22%

-3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.97%

22.71%

-4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.97%

22.71%

-4.74%

UPAR vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

UPAR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

UPAR vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison

UPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, more than GRNY's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF
0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UPAR
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF
3.41%3.28%3.32%3.04%4.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


UPAR and GRNY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRNY has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to UPAR (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UPAR dropped -39.54% vs GRNY's -24.18%.

On 1-year performance, GRNY leads with 17.57% vs 15.74% for UPAR. On fees, UPAR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, UPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GRNY has performed better with a 17.57% return vs 15.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UPAR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNY.

UPAR has the higher dividend yield at 3.41%, compared with 0.07% for GRNY.

UPAR is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while GRNY is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for UPAR and 0.75% for GRNY.

UPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UPAR and GRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer