PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UP vs. CIFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UP vs. CIFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UP achieves a -51.09% return, which is significantly lower than CIFR's 39.16% return.


UP

1D
1.58%
1M
-18.11%
6M
-67.37%
YTD
-51.09%
1Y
-77.86%
3Y*
-48.20%
5Y*
-68.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-63.37%

CIFR

1D
16.97%
1M
-29.61%
6M
9.26%
YTD
39.16%
1Y
222.96%
3Y*
67.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UP vs. CIFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UP
Wheels Up Experience Inc.
-51.09%-60.22%-51.90%-66.70%-77.80%-34.56%
CIFR
Cipher Digital Inc.
39.16%218.10%12.35%637.50%-87.90%-54.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UP and CIFR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2021

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UP:

$232.79M

CIFR:

$8.40B

EPS

UP:

-$7.78

CIFR:

-$2.32

PS Ratio

UP:

0.32

CIFR:

45.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

UP:

$727.89M

CIFR:

$174.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

UP:

$27.38M

CIFR:

-$172.84M

EBITDA (TTM)

UP:

-$176.99M

CIFR:

-$169.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UP vs. CIFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UP
UP Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UP Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UP Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UP Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
UP Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CIFR
CIFR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CIFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIFR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CIFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIFR Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UP vs. CIFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) and Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UPCIFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.30

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.84

4.37

-5.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

8.45

-9.54

UP vs. CIFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UP Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the CIFR Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UP and CIFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UP vs. CIFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UP drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, roughly equal to the maximum CIFR drawdown of -97.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UP and CIFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UPCIFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.78%

-97.16%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.39%

-51.38%

-41.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.63%

-71.74%

-23.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.72%

-29.61%

-70.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.26%

-65.31%

-13.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

71.70%

26.50%

+45.20%

Volatility

UP vs. CIFR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) is 26.86%, while Cipher Digital Inc. (CIFR) has a volatility of 33.12%. This indicates that UP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UPCIFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.86%

33.12%

-6.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.22%

74.07%

+14.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

133.20%

110.94%

+22.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

121.69%

121.73%

-0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

114.71%

121.73%

-7.02%

Dividends

UP vs. CIFR - Dividend Comparison

Neither UP nor CIFR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UP vs. CIFR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wheels Up Experience Inc. and Cipher Digital Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
168.92M
0
(UP) Total Revenue
(CIFR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UP and CIFR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIFR has higher volatility (33.12%) compared to UP (26.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UP dropped -99.78% vs CIFR's -97.16%.

CIFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UP and CIFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer